From 4b4e7a806ceccb34cb5d32a43b70211d70ad9730 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:29:21 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree/show remove duplicate function --- a6/f61b1c07e11242e92dc7f8851c2f90c8f4d6af | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 a6/f61b1c07e11242e92dc7f8851c2f90c8f4d6af diff --git a/a6/f61b1c07e11242e92dc7f8851c2f90c8f4d6af b/a6/f61b1c07e11242e92dc7f8851c2f90c8f4d6af new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9b6ad265f --- /dev/null +++ b/a6/f61b1c07e11242e92dc7f8851c2f90c8f4d6af @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C1B431FC3 + for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:29:32 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id kMYN-QCyN6+2 for ; + Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626F1431FC0 + for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1X7CA0-0003HR-Ol; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:29:24 -0300 +Received: (nullmailer pid 20872 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 + 23:29:21 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: tree/show remove duplicate function +In-Reply-To: <87zjgbw0t5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +References: <1402134668-18587-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> + <87a98bbfab.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87zjgbw0t5.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+39~g64ba418 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:29:21 -0300 +Message-ID: <87d2d69p66.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:29:32 -0000 + +Mark Walters writes: + +> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, David Bremner wrote: +>> Mark Walters writes: +>>> + (cond ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-show-mode) +>>> + (notmuch-show-get-message-properties)) +>>> + ((eq major-mode 'notmuch-tree-mode) +>>> + (notmuch-tree-get-message-properties)))) +>> +>> I see this already existed, but it looks weird to me to have a two test +>> cond with no else. Is it intentional to have the code drop through and +>> do nothing if neither case matches? It seems like it might be better to +>> signal an error. +> +> I can definitely do that. But as a comparison +> notmuch-search-get-result and notmuch-search-find-thread-id "work" in +> any buffer in the sense of returning nil but not complaining so perhaps +> the current version is more consistent. +> + +It occurs to me that we can fix all 3 places in a followup patch, +so I'll push this for now. + +d -- 2.26.2