From 4b21fc50b770ecfbe09fe654e1d4a777958b87ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:08:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] old == age --- doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn index 308eb892c..879acb866 100644 --- a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn +++ b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn @@ -17,4 +17,11 @@ Quick hack to be able to list old entries first : this patch adds a new type of sort "old". -However, I wonder if it would be better to add another option for inline like "sortorder" with "desc" or "asc" keywords ? \ No newline at end of file +> Hmm, take another look at your patch above. Comapre the added lines with +> the "age" lines just above them. It's identical; age already does what +> you want. --[[Joey]] + +However, I wonder if it would be better to add another option for inline like "sortorder" with "desc" or "asc" keywords ? + +> That might be cleaner, since it would allow sorting pages in reverse by +> title. If someone ever had a reason to do that. --[[Joey]] -- 2.26.2