From 479e0a275306fb811090a9c761b711f671f8d23a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:41:08 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Breaking a really long thread --- 11/0076efc6a1d959b6e8d3438a2a8e3e71726092 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 11/0076efc6a1d959b6e8d3438a2a8e3e71726092 diff --git a/11/0076efc6a1d959b6e8d3438a2a8e3e71726092 b/11/0076efc6a1d959b6e8d3438a2a8e3e71726092 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5c152fad2 --- /dev/null +++ b/11/0076efc6a1d959b6e8d3438a2a8e3e71726092 @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906F06DE02A7 + for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 05:41:21 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.021 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[AWL=-0.010, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 8ainMvz3b9bJ for ; + Sat, 2 Apr 2016 05:41:13 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF6F6DE0281 + for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 05:41:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) + (envelope-from ) + id 1amKs4-00023V-87; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 08:41:44 -0400 +Received: (nullmailer pid 2988 invoked by uid 1000); + Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:41:08 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: David Mazieres expires 2016-06-30 PDT + , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread +In-Reply-To: <87twjkopb8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +References: <1459015043-8460-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> + <87twjkopb8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+74~g6c60fb1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 09:41:08 -0300 +Message-ID: <87a8lci3ob.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:41:21 -0000 + +David Mazieres writes: + + +> Is there any way to break an existing thread (so as to start over with a +> smaller thread), or otherwise to tweak the threading rules so that a +> particular References header gets ignored. + +Currently there is no way to do this, as threads are "stateless" +i.e. created on the fly by _notmuch_create_thread based only on +immutable mail data. We'd have to be willing to dump/restore any +threading hints we added to the database, but we're already headed down +that path with the libconfig stuff anyway. Something we _almost_ have +the infrastructure in place for would be to blacklist a particular +reference (e.g. by regex) by storing the blacklist as database +metadata. That would solve your particular problem, although I'm not +sure it it's general enough. Keeping global state for all thread +breaking sounds a bit clunky. + +> It's annoyingly slow to open +> a thread with 10,000 messages just to read one SMS. I'm almost tempted +> to mangle the messages on delivery and remove the References header +> before notmuch sees them, but it would be nice to have a cleaner +> solution, as there are other situations in which one might want to +> "reset" a really long thread. + +Like this thread ;). -- 2.26.2