From 455bc1dd6236da313cf1a1c362a864c5fd8045dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xu Wang Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:25:59 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: ask notmuch to find back "reply-to's" --- 91/9cd44ff9494de32eb7a0f43d04ad273ad26b77 | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 91/9cd44ff9494de32eb7a0f43d04ad273ad26b77 diff --git a/91/9cd44ff9494de32eb7a0f43d04ad273ad26b77 b/91/9cd44ff9494de32eb7a0f43d04ad273ad26b77 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..88459972e --- /dev/null +++ b/91/9cd44ff9494de32eb7a0f43d04ad273ad26b77 @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4626DE00F5 + for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:11 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.503 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, + DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, + RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id Xm_WAVWigNKF for ; + Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com + [209.85.218.50]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94EDC6DE0032 + for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f189so171166434oig.3 + for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=Ul5dgKqV7gEOGO3x7xE7BiTZOQWfENgM76Gfi1ha4PU=; + b=mJSouROrVq1GAl7iXZOwCFLE9EHNDXMNy6cqpACfXl9ol9ptLl43PWUKR40w+WSWHe + o2rJaIWjETLyV+XsOcdHe9H45Od2/+/7+gdrLXy39mEKt0nqAFC1LTcfkERSLPY7hVNO + WNxWil4u1ea4Y4NeUBhLZdy+WBt5AyibWA8WpChozTSD6B/kbHsyUY1Vhw2IZbGgj53F + eTB+Of+j5E0hsNLH1ZEtpLpsz9KLy0SlIz+Ox0vQ8gHubU/RSvy1znAlQeXgnYG8OdDz + uPNcHbQK5xh/7IQ4sm+S6K2W8rMNd7dPA9imsVQgT8dkjmKLLh1O26fl9cxgcLW+nr+t + kM3Q== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=Ul5dgKqV7gEOGO3x7xE7BiTZOQWfENgM76Gfi1ha4PU=; + b=iOfjnOzPVkBbwBx+VcmG/q+2QCcr0z4HPEJsn8lRMYZlDECrQr0sMK0HSpvqA+3c8Y + dpLv6IivX0EnLGGRF/a1PRiKtqrKs3+ecbOjj8dm1a1C0TgtcjBe0Kmq7lTT+rvmT2VL + kGvswpgVcFx/C3TAHRd5BvZo/IO/TOh5Bq6Kzee7yGUr47FcloePklnP2hdnRo3fq2eG + LGv01OqaSgPotMuNm0fY46SR8LOxgE4ZEGD8A3fFkWKjVjwVzVJ1utHu0RobYU47s0sl + R55I+I9jgQTBnVw6F2VJ8+yIA9kHWx8gQFCib7VKuhSL180UG1MXOzn7t3MFRTwU7JzA + N/BA== +X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLO3kQGG8FNPrd/Hk7T0AYzj4Vgrew7fbmDZ4pWbg63pRF455KWL+yMgSTfMbZDeimD7sAa3V73CBZdIw== +X-Received: by 10.202.4.204 with SMTP id 195mr5082761oie.173.1467570359499; + Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.202.212.67 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <87inwmyhoi.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> +References: + + <87inwmyhoi.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> +From: Xu Wang +Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 14:25:59 -0400 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: ask notmuch to find back "reply-to's" +To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:26:11 -0000 + +On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor + wrote: +> On Sat 2016-07-02 20:28:41 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: +>> Hello all, +>> +>> I have a situation where sometimes I sync a later message. For +>> example, the following happens on times: +>> +>> 1a. sync message 1. +>> 1b. not much new +>> 2a. sync message 3 (which replied to message 2) +>> 2b. not much new +>> 3. sync message 2 (which replied to message 1) +>> 3b. not much new +>> +>> This happens because of my workflow of offlineimap. It takes a long +>> time to sync some folders so often I prefer to skip, but sometimes +>> they contain replies. +> +> on most systems, assuming standard headers, notmuch should indeed +> assemble these into the same thread. +> +> the relevant headers are In-Reply-To and References. +> +> Can you show those headers for this example? If they have these message-IDs: +> +> message 1: XXX +> message 2: YYY +> message 3: ZZZ +> +> then i'd expect the following headers: +> +> message 1: +> Message-Id: XXX +> +> message 2: +> Message-Id: YYY +> In-Reply-To: XXX +> References: XXX +> message 3: +> Message-Id: ZZZ +> In-Reply-To: YYY +> References: XXX, YYY +> +> +> If notmuch has indexed them all, they should all be part of the same +> thread. + +Ah good to know! I will keep eye out for this issue to pop up. I don't +have it now since I performed a clean notmuch new to build database. + +Thank you for detailed response!! + +Kind regards, + +Xu + +> +> --dkg -- 2.26.2