From 4481b2cc66f291da6ec310595a6706947f1b3f81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:02:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] web commit by hb --- doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn index 879acb866..9054beadc 100644 --- a/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn +++ b/doc/patchqueue/inline_-_sort_by_old_first.mdwn @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ this patch adds a new type of sort "old". > the "age" lines just above them. It's identical; age already does what > you want. --[[Joey]] +>> Well, $b and $a are switched in 'old' comparing to 'age'... According to the documentation, *The default, "age" is to sort newest pages first*. I just want the reverse, and that's why I just switched the $a and $b args of the sort func.... --HB + However, I wonder if it would be better to add another option for inline like "sortorder" with "desc" or "asc" keywords ? > That might be cleaner, since it would allow sorting pages in reverse by -- 2.26.2