From 41f87a9682bc5d127b281c312ab45e53725d9010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Raeburn Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:25:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] In profile-reading performance test, print microseconds not milliseconds git-svn-id: svn://anonsvn.mit.edu/krb5/trunk@24472 dc483132-0cff-0310-8789-dd5450dbe970 --- src/tests/threads/profread.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/tests/threads/profread.c b/src/tests/threads/profread.c index ccc86a884..2367b5a1d 100644 --- a/src/tests/threads/profread.c +++ b/src/tests/threads/profread.c @@ -273,8 +273,8 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[]) * performance issue you're chasing down, different values may be * of particular interest, so report all the info we've got. */ - printf ("Overall run time with %d threads = %Lfs, %Lfms per iteration.\n", - n_threads, wallclock, 1000 * wallclock / iter_count); + printf ("Overall run time with %d threads = %Lfs, %.2Lfus per iteration.\n", + n_threads, wallclock, 1000000 * wallclock / iter_count); user = tvsub (finish.ru_utime, start.ru_utime); sys = tvsub (finish.ru_stime, start.ru_stime); total = user + sys; @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[]) 100 * user / wallclock / n_threads, 100 * sys / wallclock / n_threads, 100 * total / wallclock / n_threads); - printf ("Total CPU use per iteration per thread: %Lfms\n", - 1000 * total / n_threads / iter_count); + printf ("Total CPU use per iteration per thread: %.2Lfus\n", + 1000000 * total / n_threads / iter_count); return 0; } -- 2.26.2