From 4175cf5fbafa795b1951085028a205f33148f855 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felipe Contreras Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 02:20:22 +1900 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings --- 53/0ee391d2d15f5496279e0a3a63659394e43976 | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 53/0ee391d2d15f5496279e0a3a63659394e43976 diff --git a/53/0ee391d2d15f5496279e0a3a63659394e43976 b/53/0ee391d2d15f5496279e0a3a63659394e43976 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2dc659641 --- /dev/null +++ b/53/0ee391d2d15f5496279e0a3a63659394e43976 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F18431FB6 + for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:30 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id n+KeSfXdvH4C for ; + Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com + [209.85.217.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CF6A431FAF + for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:25 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x10so1391322lbi.22 + for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:23 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id + :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; + bh=k7LfQFQs/CwHWzHhLviNAeh8GwWYlTVEhUCr3CnH22A=; + b=tq5NKWhyjhVkrQx2vioWBbkMJ+zZHQD9JBMAYFX87bS1N7Adt9mBaMsNU5JtySvq4v + jDk9JK0vcRdFXJsWIF+dKvSQ6XlzRTjNyn8nqOelJGYGCYJYHkzZudkFO5KYiXZALHzT + /2Ow7W7NsYfIRyAGIH01Bh/qxEUqo7SDedzHwATCMu5K6q3VyNfgpOfGBRLv4jf+aQNZ + W4JNC78r2ZT1kqw3zDn/+x73nAMtblOw2FfEjvZmkQIFkIEttMSaI0m5dDPmYiL7xIf7 + hPR7bhQ67QP2pjQMejK66ALDPl1VeMjNE0zIjq9EdZg35XS21br0usZmGAXGzkwMRZ02 + YU2A== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.112.139.226 with SMTP id rb2mr16134410lbb.12.1366788022580; + Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:22 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:20:22 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> + <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet> + + <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> +Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:20:22 -0500 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings +From: Felipe Contreras +To: David Bremner +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:20:30 -0000 + +On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:35 PM, David Bremner wrote: +> Felipe Contreras writes: +> +>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, David Bremner wrote: +>>> +>>> OK, but that doesn't really help us deal with support requests e.g. on IRC. +>>> Some "feature requests" for the bindings: +>> +>> Can you point to some of these requests, or are they hypothetical? +> +> I don't know how many support requests we've got, but yes, I remember at +> least one. + +That's not a huge motivation. + +>> Moreover, wouldn't making sure that the bindings are package mostly +>> solve this issue? +> +> Well, people wouldn't have to build and install the bindings, _if_ they +> happened to be using an OS with packages available. But not everyone +> uses binary packages. I guess for me it's just a software quality issue +> to have some minimal level of documentation. + +If somebody needs that information it's very easy find, just googling +'notmuch ruby bindings', or looking at the way packages do it, which +this patch actually helps to solve. + +-- +Felipe Contreras -- 2.26.2