From 34cc6d244d948655f2fc37fd547af95a51c430b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:38:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ? --- 77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f diff --git a/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f b/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fcd5f0143 --- /dev/null +++ b/77/cd8c013b5e454273dee96e124bdc199686c24f @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB12431FC3 + for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:39:00 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id oGq3ssGSM6Iv for ; + Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:38:52 -0800 (PST) +Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52AD2431FAF + for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:38:52 -0800 (PST) +Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1XtL0f-00088U-BJ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:38:45 -0400 +Received: (nullmailer pid 13219 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 + 18:38:39 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Olivier Berger +Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ? +In-Reply-To: <87d28gd703.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> +References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> + <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> + <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> + <87r3wx9eaq.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + <87d28gd703.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:38:39 +0100 +Message-ID: <87y4qz86s0.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:39:00 -0000 + +Olivier Berger writes: + +> +> In any case, there has been a change in the way this worked. + +That's strange, but since it is currently working as we expect, the main +question is whether we should change how excludes work. + +> +> For the moment, I'm using the following saved search : +> (tag:deleted or tag:spam) and tag:deleted +> which will display the deleted mails. + +Right. For me it would be less confusing to write + + (tag:deleted and tag:spam) or tag:deleted + +I agree that the interaction of excludes makes (either version of ) this +search look a bit strange. + -- 2.26.2