From 33d934b5ca1666bfe3f9fa3004ad7d31c38c69c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:05:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn b/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn index 045bfd7aa..06c82337a 100644 --- a/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ I think it could be really powerful and useful, especially if it becomes part of > It looks like an interesting idea. I don't have time right now to look at it in depth, but it looks interesting. -- [[Will]] +> I agree such a separation makes some sense. But note that the discussion on [[todo/structured_page_data]] +> talks about associating data types with fields for a good reason: It's hard to later develop a good UI for +> querying or modifying a page's data if all the data has an implicit type "string". --[[Joey]] + ## Second Pass I have written additional plugins which integrate with the [[plugins/contrib/field]] plugin to both set and get structured page data. -- 2.26.2