From 3132852869b71df16bf1bbf2974eb2a34cbbae13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johnny Utahh Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:18:50 +1900 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? --- ba/b131d35408cec9deb986c8b3c7f442db692673 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 149 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ba/b131d35408cec9deb986c8b3c7f442db692673 diff --git a/ba/b131d35408cec9deb986c8b3c7f442db692673 b/ba/b131d35408cec9deb986c8b3c7f442db692673 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7ae3dbf03 --- /dev/null +++ b/ba/b131d35408cec9deb986c8b3c7f442db692673 @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC656DE02DD + for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:18:54 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.696 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, + HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 0mdUkTAKqC03 for ; + Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:18:52 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D1A6DE0243 + for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [10.30.1.75] (unknown [67.109.75.165]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9B3322E25F; + Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:18:50 -0400 (EDT) +Message-ID: <55A51A4A.2080000@johnnyutahh.com> +Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:18:50 -0500 +From: Johnny Utahh +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; + rv:17.0) Gecko/20131118 Thunderbird/17.0.11 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? +References: <877fq2vo85.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +In-Reply-To: <877fq2vo85.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; + boundary="------------060600080005050806000504" +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:18:54 -0000 + +This is a multi-part message in MIME format. +--------------060600080005050806000504 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit + +David confirms below. + +-------- Original Message -------- +Subject: Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? +Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:54:34 +0200 +From: David Bremner +To: Johnny Utahh , +notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com + + + +Johnny Utahh writes: + +> On 7/14/15, 2:32 AM, David Bremner wrote: +>> Johnny Utahh writes: +>> +>>> Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature? Details: +>>>https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues/22 +>>> +>> Maybe new.ignore (man notmuch-config) can serve roughly the same +>> purpose. +> +> Thanks. Will files and directories that were previously 'notmuch new' +> searched and newly-assigned to new.ignore still be indexed? + +Yes, this only affects the operation of "notmuch new" + +d + + +--------------060600080005050806000504 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit + + + + + + + David confirms below.
+

+ -------- Original Message -------- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Subject: + Re: Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature?
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:54:34 +0200
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Johnny Utahh <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com>, + notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com
+
+
+ 
Johnny Utahh <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com> writes:
+
+> On 7/14/15, 2:32 AM, David Bremner wrote:
+>> Johnny Utahh <notmuchmail.org@johnnyutahh.com> writes:
+>>
+>>> Does Notmuch employ a '.noupdate'-like feature?  Details:
+>>> https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues/22
+>>>
+>> Maybe new.ignore (man notmuch-config) can serve roughly the same
+>> purpose.
+>
+> Thanks. Will files and directories that were previously 'notmuch new' 
+> searched and newly-assigned to new.ignore still be indexed?
+
+Yes, this only affects the operation of "notmuch new"
+
+d
+
+
+ + + +--------------060600080005050806000504-- -- 2.26.2