From 289152778537010f290165f85048f0eedcc8f706 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: stevenknight Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:55:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add a -t (timing) option to runtest.py. (Baptiste Lepilleur) Add sections to the README to describe better how to change and execute SCons in-place. git-svn-id: http://scons.tigris.org/svn/scons/trunk@1421 fdb21ef1-2011-0410-befe-b5e4ea1792b1 --- README | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- config | 6 +- runtest.py | 28 +++++- 3 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 5a5aeb7a..d4d27575 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -2,21 +2,38 @@ SCons - a software construction tool -Welcome to the SCons development tree. The real purpose of this tree is -to package SCons for production distribution in a variety of formats, +Welcome to the SCons development tree. The real purpose of this tree +is to package SCons for production distribution in a variety of formats, not just to hack SCons code. -To that extent, the normal development cycle (enforced by Aegis) is not -to test the code directly, but to package SCons, unpack the package, -"install" SCons in a test subdirectory, and then to run the tests -against the unpacked and installed software. This helps eliminate -problems caused by, for example, failure to update the list of files to -be packaged. +If all you want to do is install and run SCons, it will be easier for you +to download and install the scons-{version}.tar.gz or scons-{version}.zip +package rather than to work with the packaging logic in this tree. -Note that if all you want to do is install and run SCons, it -will probably be easier for you to download and install the -scons-{version}.tar.gz or scons-{version}.zip package rather than to -work with the packaging logic in this tree. +To the extent that this tree is about building SCons packages, the +*full* development cycle (enforced by Aegis) is not to test the code +directly, but to package SCons, unpack the package, "install" SCons in +a test subdirectory, and then to run the tests against the unpacked and +installed software. This helps eliminate problems caused by, for example, +failure to update the list of files to be packaged. + +For just working on making an individual change to the SCons source, +however, you don't actually need to build or install SCons; you +*can* actually edit and execute SCons in-place. See the following +sections below for more information: + + MAKING CHANGES + How to edit and executing SCons in-place. + + DEBUGGING + Tips for debugging problems in SCons. + + TESTING + How to use the automated regression tests. + + DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW + An example of how to put the edit/execute/test pieces + together in a reasonable development workflow. LATEST VERSION @@ -86,6 +103,14 @@ In this case, your options are: INSTALLATION ============ + NOTE: You don't need to build SCons packages or install SCons if + you just want to work on developing a patch. See the sections + about MAKING CHANGES and TESTING below if you just want to submit + a bug fix or some new functionality. See the sections below about + BUILDING PACKAGES and TESTING PACKAGES if your enhancement involves + changing the way in which SCons is packaged and/or installed on an + end-user system. + Assuming your system satisfies the installation requirements in the previous section, install SCons from this package by first populating the build/scons/ subdirectory. (For an easier way to install SCons, @@ -201,6 +226,117 @@ $HOME--that is, the scons script itself $HOME/bin and the associated library in $HOME/lib/scons, for example. +MAKING CHANGES +============== + +Because SCons is implemented in a scripting language, you don't need to +build it in order to make changes and test them. + +Virtually all of the SCons functionality exists in the "build engine," +the src/engine/SCons subdirectory hierarchy that contains all of the +modules that make up SCons. The src/script/scons.py wrapper script exists +mainly to find the appropriate build engine library and then execute it. + +In order to make your own change locally and test them by hand, simply +edit modules in the local src/engine/SCons and set the SCONS_LIB_DIR +to point to that directory. Here is one way you can set up environment +variables to do this on a UNIX or Linux system: + + $ setenv MYSCONS=`pwd`/src + $ setenv SCONS_LIB_DIR=$MYSCONS + $ python $MYSCONS/script/scons.py [arguments] + +Or on Windows: + + C:\scons>set MYSCONS=%cd%\src + C:\scons>set SCONS_LIB_DIR=%MYSCONS% + C:\scons>python %MYSCONS%\script\scons.py [arguments] + +You can use the -C option to have SCons change directory to another +location where you already have a build configuration set up (for example, +if the SCons configuration for your project seems to be blocked by +an SCons bug, and you want to see if a patch you make actually fixes +that bug): + + $ python $MYSCONS/script/scons.py -C /some/other/location [arguments] + +Lastly, if you want to be able to just execute your modified version +of SCons from the command line, you can make it executable and add its +directory to your $PATH like so: + + $ chmod 755 src/script/scons.py + $ export PATH=$PATH:`pwd`/src/script + +You should then be able to run this version of SCons by just typing +"scons.py" at your UNIX or Linux command line. + +Note that the regular SCons development process makes heavy use of +automated testing. See the TESTING and DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW sections +below for more information about the automated regression tests and how +they can be used in a development cycle to validate that your changes +don't break existing functionality. + + +DEBUGGING +========= + +Python comes with a good interactive debugger. When debugging changes +by hand (i.e., when not using the automated tests), you can invoke SCons +under control of the Python debugger by specifying the --debug=pdb option: + + $ scons --debug=pdb [arguments] + > /home/knight/SCons/src/engine/SCons/Script/Main.py(927)_main() + -> default_warnings = [ SCons.Warnings.CorruptSConsignWarning, + (Pdb) + +Once in the debugger, you can set breakpoints at lines in files in the +build engine modules by providing the path name of the file relative to +the src/engine subdirectory (that is, including the SCons/ as the first +directory component): + + (Pdb) b SCons/Tool/msvc.py:158 + +The debugger also supports single stepping, stepping into functions, +printing variables, etc. + +Trying to debug problems found by running the automated tests (see the +TESTING section, below) is more difficult, because the test automation +harness re-invokes SCons and captures output. Consequently, there isn't an +easy way to invoke the Python debugger in a useful way on any particular +SCons call within a test script. + +The most effective technique for debugging problems that occur during an +automated test is to use the good old tried-and-true technique of adding +statements to print tracing information. But note that you can't just use +"print" statement, or even "sys.stdout.write()," because those change the +SCons output, and the automated tests usually look for matches of specific +output strings to decide if a given SCons invocations passes the test. + +To deal with this, SCons supports a Trace() function that (by default) +will print messages to your console screen ("/dev/tty" on UNIX or Linux, +"con" on Windows). By adding Trace() calls to the SCons source code: + + def sample_method(self, value): + fromn SCons.Debug import Trace + Trace('called sample_method(%s, %s)\n' % (self, value)) + +You can then run automated tests that print any arbitrary information +you wish about what's going on inside SCons, without interfering with +the test automation. + +The Trace() function can also redirect its output to a file, rather than +the screen: + + def sample_method(self, value): + fromn SCons.Debug import Trace + Trace('called sample_method(%s, %s)\n' % (self, value), + file='trace.out') + +Where the Trace() function sends its output is stateful: once you use the +"file=" argument, all subsequent calls to Trace() send their output to +the same file, until another call with a "file=" argument is reached. + + TESTING ======= @@ -221,8 +357,21 @@ You may specifically list one or more tests to be run: $ python runtest.py test/option-j.py test/Program.py -Alternatively, the runtest.py script takes a -a option that searches -the tree for all of the tests and runs them: +You also use the -f option to execute just the tests listed in a specified +text file: + + $ cat testlist.txt + test/option-j.py + test/Program.py + $ python runtest.py -f testlist.txt + +One test must be listed per line, and any lines that begin with '#' +will be ignored (allowing you, for example, to comment out tests that +are currently passing and then uncomment all of the tests in the file +for a final validation run). + +The runtest.py script also takes a -a option that searches the tree for +all of the tests and runs them: $ python runtest.py -a @@ -237,6 +386,101 @@ unpacked packages in the build/test-*/ subdirectories. See the "TESTING PACKAGES" section below. +DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW +==================== + + CAVEAT: The point of this section isn't to describe one dogmatic + workflow. Just running the test suite can be time-consuming, and + getting a patch to pass all of the tests can be more so. If you're + genuinely blocked, it may make more sense to submit a patch with + a note about which tests still fail, and how. Someone else may be + able to take your "initial draft" and figure out how to improve it + to fix the rest of the tests. So there's plenty of room for use of + good judgement. + +The various techniques described in the above sections can be combined +to create simple and effective workflows that allow you to validate +that patches you submit to SCons don't break existing functionality and +have adequate testing, thereby increasing the speed with which they can +be integrated. + +For example, suppose your project's SCons configuration is blocked by +an SCons bug, and you decide you want to fix it and submit the patch. +Here's one possible way to go about doing that (using UNIX/Linux as the +development platform, Windows users can translate as appropriate)): + + -- Change to the top of your checked-out SCons tree and set + $SCONS_LIB_DIR to point to its build engine: + + $ setenv SCONS_LIB_DIR=`pwd`/src + + -- Confirm that the bug still exists in this version of SCons + by using the -C option to run the broken build: + + $ python script/scons.py -C /home/me/broken_project . + + -- Fix the bug in SCons by editing appropriate module files + underneath src/engine/SCons. + + -- Confirm that you've fixed the bug affecting your project: + + $ python script/scons.py -C /home/me/broken_project . + + -- Test to see if your fix had any unintended side effects + that break existing functionality: + + $ python runtest.py -a + + Be patient, there are more than 500 test scripts in the + whole suite. + + If any test scripts fail, they will be listed in a summary at + the end of the run. Some test scripts may also report NO RESULT + because (for example) your local system is the wrong type or + doesn't have some installed utilities necessary to run the + script. In general, you can ignore the NO RESULT list. + + -- Cut-and-paste the list of failed tests into a file: + + $ cat > failed.txt + test/failed-test-1.py + test/failed-test-2.py + test/failed-test-3.py + ^D + $ + + -- Now debug the test failures and fix them, either by changing + SCons, or by making necessary changes to the tests (if, for + example, you have a strong reason to change functionality, or + if you find that the bug really is in the test script itself). + After each change, use the runtest.py -f option to examine the + effects of the change on the subset of tests that originally + failed: + + $ [edit] + $ python runtest.py -f failed.txt + + Repeat this until all of the tests that originally failed + now pass. + + -- Now you need to go back and validate that any changes you + made while getting the tests to pass didn't break the fix you + originally put in, or introduce any *additional* unintended side + effects that broke other tests: + + $ python script/scons.py -C /home/me/broken_project . + $ python runtest.py -a + + If you find any newly-broken tests, add them to your "failed.txt" + file and go back to the previous step. + +Of course, the above is only one suggested workflow. In practice, there's +a lot of room for judgment and experience to make things go quicker. +For example, if you're making a change to just the Java support, you +might start looking for regressions by just running the test/Java/*.py +tests instead of running all of "runtest.py -a". + + BUILDING PACKAGES ================= diff --git a/config b/config index 17aa2d33..0e83aad3 100644 --- a/config +++ b/config @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ diff_command = test $? -le 1"; /* - * We use a runtest.pl script to execute tests. This takes care of + * We use a runtest.py script to execute tests. This takes care of * massaging environment variables and the like to test against the * unpacked package in the current directory. * @@ -258,9 +258,9 @@ diff_command = * is set appropriately during a baseline test. So we just use the * proper aesub variable to comment out the expanded $spe. */ -test_command = "python1.5 ${Source runtest.py Absolute} -p tar-gz -v ${SUBSTitute '\\.[CD][0-9]+$' '' ${VERsion}} -q ${File_Name}"; +test_command = "python1.5 ${Source runtest.py Absolute} -p tar-gz -t -v ${SUBSTitute '\\.[CD][0-9]+$' '' ${VERsion}} -q ${File_Name}"; -batch_test_command = "python1.5 ${Source runtest.py Absolute} -p tar-gz -v ${SUBSTitute '\\.[CD][0-9]+$' '' ${VERsion}} -o ${Output} --aegis ${File_Names} ${COMment $spe}"; +batch_test_command = "python1.5 ${Source runtest.py Absolute} -p tar-gz -t -v ${SUBSTitute '\\.[CD][0-9]+$' '' ${VERsion}} -o ${Output} --aegis ${File_Names} ${COMment $spe}"; new_test_filename = "test/CHANGETHIS.py"; diff --git a/runtest.py b/runtest.py index 964b4410..e96ed831 100644 --- a/runtest.py +++ b/runtest.py @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ # command line it will execute before # executing it. This suppresses that print. # +# -t Print the execution time of each test. +# # -X The scons "script" is an executable; don't # feed it to Python. # @@ -84,6 +86,7 @@ import re import stat import string import sys +import time all = 0 debug = '' @@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ scons_exec = None outputfile = None testlistfile = None version = '' +print_time = lambda fmt, time: None if os.name == 'java': python = os.path.join(sys.prefix, 'jython') @@ -134,17 +138,18 @@ Options: zip .zip distribution --passed Summarize which tests passed. -q, --quiet Don't print the test being executed. + -t, --time Print test execution time. -v version Specify the SCons version. -X Test script is executable, don't feed to Python. -x SCRIPT, --exec SCRIPT Test SCRIPT. --xml Print results in SCons XML format. """ -opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], "adf:ho:P:p:qv:Xx:", +opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], "adf:ho:P:p:qv:Xx:t", ['all', 'aegis', 'debug', 'file=', 'help', 'output=', 'package=', 'passed', 'python=', 'quiet', - 'version=', 'exec=', + 'version=', 'exec=', 'time', 'xml']) for o, a in opts: @@ -171,6 +176,8 @@ for o, a in opts: python = a elif o == '-q' or o == '--quiet': printcommand = 0 + elif o == '-t' or o == '--time': + print_time = lambda fmt, time: sys.stdout.write(fmt % time) elif o == '-v' or o == '--version': version = a elif o == '-X': @@ -291,8 +298,10 @@ class XML(PopenExecutor): f.write(' %s\n' % self.status) f.write(' %s\n' % self.stdout) f.write(' %s\n' % self.stderr) + f.write(' \n' % self.test_time) f.write(' \n') def footer(self, f): + f.write(' \n' % self.total_time) f.write(' \n') format_class = { @@ -494,6 +503,15 @@ class Unbuffered: sys.stdout = Unbuffered(sys.stdout) +# time.clock() is the suggested interface for doing benchmarking timings, +# but time.time() does a better job on Linux systems, so let that be +# the non-Windows default. +if sys.platform == 'win32': + time_func = time.clock +else: + time_func = time.time + +total_start_time = time_func() for t in tests: t.command_args = [python, '-tt'] if debug: @@ -502,7 +520,13 @@ for t in tests: t.command_str = string.join(map(escape, t.command_args), " ") if printcommand: sys.stdout.write(t.command_str + "\n") + test_start_time = time_func() t.execute() + t.test_time = time_func() - test_start_time + print_time("Test execution time: %.1f seconds\n", t.test_time) +if len(tests) > 0: + tests[0].total_time = time_func() - total_start_time + print_time("Total execution time for all tests: %.1f seconds\n", tests[0].total_time) passed = filter(lambda t: t.status == 0, tests) fail = filter(lambda t: t.status == 1, tests) -- 2.26.2