From 273075cdf5fcd0b4756ca47860849f174f7ede57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zac Medico Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:29:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] depgraph: fix installed masked warning This warning has been broken since commit 5f65c2294df592a6a4e0f0fff0bedec49ed3491a. --- pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py b/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py index ab62dc773..1630a72d0 100644 --- a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py +++ b/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py @@ -3526,18 +3526,18 @@ class depgraph(object): return pkg, existing - def _pkg_visibility_check(self, pkg, allow_unstable_keywords=False, allow_license_changes=False, allow_unmasks=False): + def _pkg_visibility_check(self, pkg, allow_unstable_keywords=False, + allow_license_changes=False, allow_unmasks=False, trust_graph=True): if pkg.visible: return True - if pkg in self._dynamic_config.digraph: + if trust_graph and pkg in self._dynamic_config.digraph: # Sometimes we need to temporarily disable # dynamic_config._autounmask, but for overall - # consistency in dependency resolution, in any - # case we want to respect autounmask visibity - # for packages that have already been added to - # the dependency graph. + # consistency in dependency resolution, in most + # cases we want to treat packages in the graph + # as though they are visible. return True if not self._dynamic_config._autounmask: @@ -4446,7 +4446,8 @@ class depgraph(object): # packages masked by license, since the user likely wants # to adjust ACCEPT_LICENSE. if pkg in final_db: - if not self._pkg_visibility_check(pkg) and \ + if not self._pkg_visibility_check(pkg, + trust_graph=False) and \ (pkg_in_graph or 'LICENSE' in pkg.masks): self._dynamic_config._masked_installed.add(pkg) else: -- 2.26.2