From 10160427ccdb624566458a41fa1cbfc2eb8fe20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Austin Clements Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:48:12 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: excessive thread fusing --- 60/b906b14aa54eed119e2ce33b2a4920fa1e98de | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+) create mode 100644 60/b906b14aa54eed119e2ce33b2a4920fa1e98de diff --git a/60/b906b14aa54eed119e2ce33b2a4920fa1e98de b/60/b906b14aa54eed119e2ce33b2a4920fa1e98de new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7cc007d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/60/b906b14aa54eed119e2ce33b2a4920fa1e98de @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104A0431FBD + for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:48:26 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 71QgLFBC2ztY for ; + Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:48:18 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu + [18.7.68.36]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05FFE431FBC + for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:48:17 -0700 (PDT) +X-AuditID: 12074424-f79e26d000000c70-72-5353fa5035b5 +Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) + (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (Client did not present a certificate) + by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP + id 6F.84.03184.15AF3535; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:48:17 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) + by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s3KGmFND030104 + for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:48:16 -0400 +Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) + (authenticated bits=0) + (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) + by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s3KGmD0K007793 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) + for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:48:15 -0400 +Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) id 1Wbuua-0005a5-Qi + for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:48:12 -0400 +Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:48:12 -0400 +From: Austin Clements +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: excessive thread fusing +Message-ID: <20140420164812.GB25817@mit.edu> +References: <87ioq5mrbz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> + + <20140419210439.GC1797@sid.nuvreauspam> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <20140419210439.GC1797@sid.nuvreauspam> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) +X-Brightmail-Tracker: + H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nohv4KzjYYMkcZovrN2cyOzB6PFt1 + izmAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY9fODSwFE3gqzmzezNTAeIqzi5GTQ0LAROL2rpVsELaYxIV7 + 64FsLg4hgdlMEh9urWeEcM4zSpw+0QCVeckkMf3LV2YI5xCjxISZ24DKODhYBFQl3mw2AhnF + JqAhsW3/ckYQW0RAWmLn3dmsILawgIrExjOzmUBsXgEdidmbWqHmNDJK9D3bwgaREJQ4OfMJ + C4jNLKAlcePfSyaQ+cxAg5b/4wAJcwKd3fzgDjOILQo0c8rJbWwTGAVnIemehaR7FkL3Akbm + VYyyKblVurmJmTnFqcm6xcmJeXmpRbrmermZJXqpKaWbGMHB6qKyg7H5kNIhRgEORiUe3hc/ + goKFWBPLiitzDzFKcjApifIWfA4OFuJLyk+pzEgszogvKs1JLQaGBwezkgjvyZdAOd6UxMqq + 1KJ8mJQ0B4uSOO9ba6tgIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimKwMB4eSBG80yFDBotT01Iq0zJwShDQTByfI + cB6g4T0gNbzFBYm5xZnpEPlTjIpS4rwmX4ASAiCJjNI8uF5YMnnFKA70ijBvLEg7DzARwXW/ + AhrMBDT475kAkMEliQgpqQbGLcsS0sxNNq9YqK85PXoT247X37WC5A14UiVLFlxoVbr9+tHT + sG/HLhmbB925t2XnYUu3A2f27j/7nEV64c2FzbPCn8y9k5P8vNQs53fD+Z9aJfetdldMnq/d + Kyl8w/FN09RtKicS9AqPF84ttz28dtfv5bHxt1McpwZ0FckdTOnynnGpTuYUpxJLcUaioRZz + UXEiAPjCPzQBAwAA +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:48:26 -0000 + +Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Apr 20 at 12:04 am: +> On Sb, 19 apr 14, 18:52:02, Eric wrote: +> > +> > This may not actually be any help, but both hypermail and mhonarc agree +> > that two messages form a separate thread from the rest. I believe that +> > the latter, at least, is the JWZ algorithm. +> +> mutt concurs. + +Can anyone explain why JWZ *doesn't* have the same problem? I don't +see how this heuristic doesn't doom it to the same fate: + + The References field is populated from the ``References'' and/or + ``In-Reply-To'' headers. If both headers exist, take the first thing + in the In-Reply-To header that looks like a Message-ID, and append + it to the References header. + +Given this, even considering only messages 18 and 52 (which "should" +be in different threads), JWZ should find the common "parent" +e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk and link them in to the same thread: + +Add 18 (step 1) +- The combined "references" list is +- Creates and links containers 17 <- e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk <- 18 where the + first two are empty + +Add 52 (step 1) +- The combined "references" list is + +- Creates and links containers 31 <- 32 <- 39 +- Also considers container e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk, but this is already + linked, so it doesn't change it +- Creates container 52 and links e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk <- 52 (step 1C) + +18 and 52 will later get promoted over their empty parent (step 4), +but will remain in the same thread. + +What am I missing? Or are these other MUAs not using pure JWZ? -- 2.26.2