From 0ed94696c0a449b425bc319297d39060ee24dcf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:50:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] pages talking about escaping should really be escaped correctly --- doc/bugs/some_but_not_all_meta_fields_are_stored_escaped.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/some_but_not_all_meta_fields_are_stored_escaped.mdwn b/doc/bugs/some_but_not_all_meta_fields_are_stored_escaped.mdwn index d79318dd8..cbfcfd6b7 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/some_but_not_all_meta_fields_are_stored_escaped.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/some_but_not_all_meta_fields_are_stored_escaped.mdwn @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ While discussing the [[plugins/meta]] plugin on IRC, Joey pointed out that it stores most meta fields unescaped, but 'title', 'guid' and 'description' are special-cased and stored escaped (with numeric XML/HTML entities). This -is to avoid emitting markup in the of a HTML page, or in an RSS/Atom +is to avoid emitting markup in the `<title>` of a HTML page, or in an RSS/Atom feed, neither of which are subject to the [[plugins/htmlscrubber]]. However, having the meta fields "partially escaped" like this is somewhat -- 2.26.2