From 0ea4406a64f8af1143e1a819b61f95e8b1777f99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zac Medico Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:56:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] test_asynchronous_lock: test waiting --- .../tests/locks/test_asynchronous_lock.py | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/pym/portage/tests/locks/test_asynchronous_lock.py b/pym/portage/tests/locks/test_asynchronous_lock.py index 7e9fdfec9..e72adf684 100644 --- a/pym/portage/tests/locks/test_asynchronous_lock.py +++ b/pym/portage/tests/locks/test_asynchronous_lock.py @@ -37,3 +37,28 @@ class AsynchronousLockTestCase(TestCase): finally: shutil.rmtree(tempdir) + + def testAsynchronousLockWait(self): + scheduler = PollScheduler().sched_iface + tempdir = tempfile.mkdtemp() + try: + path = os.path.join(tempdir, 'lock_me') + lock1 = AsynchronousLock(path=path, scheduler=scheduler) + lock1.start() + self.assertEqual(lock1.wait(), os.EX_OK) + + # lock2 requires _force_async=True since the portage.locks + # module is not designed to work as intended here if the + # same process tries to lock the same file more than + # one time concurrently. + lock2 = AsynchronousLock(path=path, scheduler=scheduler, + _force_async=True, _force_process=True) + lock2.start() + # lock2 should we waiting for lock1 to release + self.assertEqual(lock2.returncode, None) + + lock1.unlock() + self.assertEqual(lock2.wait(), os.EX_OK) + lock2.unlock() + finally: + shutil.rmtree(tempdir) -- 2.26.2