From 0503bf7c8824d941b26da4c91b4ee1f721fcf54c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:10:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn index de4b35ef0..6a1d9f685 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ or something). >> uses `HTML::Template` but *doesn't* run `pagetemplate` hooks? >> >> It just seems strange to me that `field` needs to have its own ->> of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`), +>> variant of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`), >> and so on - I'd tend to lean more towards having `field` >> enhance the existing plugins. I'm not an ikiwiki committer, >> mind... Joey, your opinion would be appreciated! --[[smcv]] -- 2.26.2