From: W. Trevor King Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 20:37:30 +0000 (-0400) Subject: pyafm/conclusions.tex: Mention materassi09 and aioanei11 as alternatives X-Git-Tag: v1.0~239 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fca33f3d9b98d7a1f04b31e2335987db7435985f;p=thesis.git pyafm/conclusions.tex: Mention materassi09 and aioanei11 as alternatives --- diff --git a/src/pyafm/conclusions.tex b/src/pyafm/conclusions.tex index 8e044f2..9a119a2 100644 --- a/src/pyafm/conclusions.tex +++ b/src/pyafm/conclusions.tex @@ -36,3 +36,10 @@ used in \cref{sec:pyafm:discussion} to characterize and validate your apparatus. A common stack also provides a common file format for experimental data, which makes it easier to share data and analysis tools. + +While there have been other attempts SMFS control which claim to be +open source, they have either been based on closed source +tools\citep{aioanei11} or have (critically) not actually published +their source\citep{materassi09}. Both of these limitations make it +hard to realize the benefits of communal, open source development, and +the \pyafm\ stack suffers from neither.