From: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:17:36 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: calibcant/discussion.tex: Finish error propogation paragraph
X-Git-Tag: v1.0~87
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f78b629458b2662a66635b1ad29d34ef37bfc773;p=thesis.git

calibcant/discussion.tex: Finish error propogation paragraph

Replace "TODO" with "kappa shouldn't change", since I go right into
quoting numbers later on.
---

diff --git a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
index 954c895..6f1eb23 100644
--- a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ uncertainty in each parameter (\cref{fig:calibcant:statistics}).
 Values for $\sigma_p$ and $\avg{V_p^2}$ are quite sensitive to the
 location of the laser spot on the cantilever, so they can vary over
 large time scales as the microscope alignment drifts (e.g.~due to
-thermal expansion as the room warms up).  However TODO
+thermal expansion as the room warms up).  However, the calculated
+value for $\kappa$ should not vary significantly.
 
 For example, on a recent calibration run\footnote{2013-02-07T08-20-46}
 I measured $\sigma_p=35.68\pm0.87\U{V/$\mu$m}$,