From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:26:05 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=edf6e06a2f538c62b3953ed25f6e0921ed55ff5d;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features --- diff --git a/5d/fb34f076bcc739925ce303173f83115c9b0b7f b/5d/fb34f076bcc739925ce303173f83115c9b0b7f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4648b24a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/5d/fb34f076bcc739925ce303173f83115c9b0b7f @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5304D431FAF + for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:12 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Date" +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0.432 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[INVALID_DATE=0.432] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 3Mj1zgn3dG15 for ; + Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:11 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0901431FAE + for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:26:11 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEA5D52C887 + for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:09 +0100 (CET) +Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401) + id 12327DF2A3; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:09 +0100 (CET) +Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [193.174.12.196]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon) + by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2795DF2A0; + Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:07 +0100 (CET) +Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77) + (envelope-from ) + id 1RoCbd-0006PP-Hz; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:05 +0100 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> +To: Patrick Totzke , + Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +References: + <4ee8d62a.596ee30a.1833.ffffc33e@mx.google.com> + + <87k45so36b.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <4eef7faa.c1cae30a.0802.ffffaffb@mx.google.com> + + <20120120104041.23590.16718@megatron> +In-Reply-To: <20120120104041.23590.16718@megatron> +Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:26:05 -0000 +Message-ID: <20120120112605.5324.87866@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> +Subject: Re: [afew] announcing afew, + an universal tagging solution with some fancy features +Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:26:05 +0100 +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:26:12 -0000 + +Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-01-20 11:40:41) +>Quoting Justus Winter (2011-12-21 08:53:23) +>>Hey Pazz, +>> +>>Quoting Patrick Totzke (2011-12-19 19:17:12) +>>>Also, should i not get some output when calling afew with -vv ? +>> +>>Yes you should ;). Here's an example run on my box: +>Alright, I do get logging output with upstream master thanks. +> +>FYI: I found the problem with afew not finding new mails on my box. +>I had the following in my ~/.notmuch-config: +> +> +> # tags A list (separated by ';') of the tags that will be +> # added to all messages incorporated by "notmuch new= +". +> # +> [new] +> tags=3Dnew; +> +>I suspect you don't split the config value and thus afew ended up with a f= +alse tag "new;". +>its just cosmetics but nevertheless.. + +Hm, actually it does exactly that: + +def get_notmuch_new_tags(): + return notmuch_settings.get('new', 'tags').split(';') + +Could you post the relevant log messages? + +>Thanks for afew! I translated my static filter rules and am very much enjo= +ying the automagic list-id tags :) +>/p + +Cool :) + +Cheers, +Justus