From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:50:00 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: gitweb.js: No need for loop in blame_incremental's handleResponse()
X-Git-Tag: v1.7.7-rc0~113^2~1
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e8dd0e4063da6d0eecef1a6db99534e41f74b32e;p=git.git

gitweb.js: No need for loop in blame_incremental's handleResponse()

JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no need for protecting
against changes to XMLHttpRequest object behind event handler back.

Therefore there is no need for loop that was here in case `xhr' got
new changes while processing current changes.  This should make code a
bit more clear.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---

diff --git a/gitweb/static/js/blame_incremental.js b/gitweb/static/js/blame_incremental.js
index 484180528..27955ecd3 100644
--- a/gitweb/static/js/blame_incremental.js
+++ b/gitweb/static/js/blame_incremental.js
@@ -603,21 +603,16 @@ function handleResponse() {
 		return;
 	}
 
-	// extract new whole (complete) lines, and process them
-	while (xhr.prevDataLength !== xhr.responseText.length) {
-		if (xhr.readyState === 4 &&
-		    xhr.prevDataLength === xhr.responseText.length) {
-			break;
-		}
 
+	// extract new whole (complete) lines, and process them
+	if (xhr.prevDataLength !== xhr.responseText.length) {
 		xhr.prevDataLength = xhr.responseText.length;
 		var unprocessed = xhr.responseText.substring(xhr.nextReadPos);
 		xhr.nextReadPos = processData(unprocessed, xhr.nextReadPos);
-	} // end while
+	}
 
 	// did we finish work?
-	if (xhr.readyState === 4 &&
-	    xhr.prevDataLength === xhr.responseText.length) {
+	if (xhr.readyState === 4) {
 		responseLoaded(xhr);
 	}
 }