From: Frank Mori Hess <fmhess@speakeasy.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:02:14 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: on second thought, EPERM isn't any more accurate than ENODEV.
X-Git-Tag: r0_7_69~242
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d81a2b0f542cd2854630e2bfa7771471f7070903;p=comedi.git

on second thought, EPERM isn't any more accurate than ENODEV.
---

diff --git a/comedi/comedi_fops.c b/comedi/comedi_fops.c
index 47fdcf82..b125c89a 100644
--- a/comedi/comedi_fops.c
+++ b/comedi/comedi_fops.c
@@ -1631,9 +1631,10 @@ static int comedi_fop_open(struct inode *inode,struct file *file)
 
 	dev->in_request_module=0;
 
-	if(!dev->attached && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return -EPERM;
-
+	if(!dev->attached && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)){
+		DPRINTK("not attached and not root\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 ok:
 	if(!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
 		return -ENOSYS;