From: David Bremner Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:10:28 +0000 (+2000) Subject: Re: emacs / vim - time taken to open threads X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cece5cccb29a4e5081e7bb79efe7484d7887bd47;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: emacs / vim - time taken to open threads --- diff --git a/f5/e88a8be85babce3c5e8919390f3c460c62c6cb b/f5/e88a8be85babce3c5e8919390f3c460c62c6cb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3a0cf6453 --- /dev/null +++ b/f5/e88a8be85babce3c5e8919390f3c460c62c6cb @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2259431E82 + for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:11:41 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 2.438 +X-Spam-Level: ** +X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id gq8AO8yciDdP for ; + Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net + [87.98.215.224]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5A4431E62 + for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim + 4.80) (envelope-from ) + id 1YaXy3-0002Yi-P8; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:10:39 +0000 +Received: (nullmailer pid 25082 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 + 23:10:28 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Matthew Lear , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: emacs / vim - time taken to open threads +In-Reply-To: <5511DE10.80107@bubblegen.co.uk> +References: <5511DE10.80107@bubblegen.co.uk> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+86~gbed8b67 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:10:28 -0400 +Message-ID: <87384u6lgb.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:11:41 -0000 + +Matthew Lear writes: + +> +> Despite being a vi guy for years, I prefer the emacs interface to +> notmuch and really like what it provides. I'm sticking with it but there +> is clearly a problem and I'd like to solve it. It's annoying when you +> know that something isn't working as well as it should be. +> +> Is it known that emacs is slower with notmuch or do you think I have +> some kind of build / environment problem? Or could it be due to some of +> the email content (doubtful) or something else such as encoding etc? + +My experience is that the emacs interface is faster than the vim one. +At least I don't have an examples handy where emacs is slower than the +vim interface at rendering a thread. At a wild guess, I suspect it has +to do with how many attachments there are, and the emacs UI being +overenthusiastic about processing attachements. + +d