From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:58:23 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: Re: Issue with verifying cleartext signed messages
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cd42a8ab02b82107e7ba213b479856c3b4c28d08;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: Issue with verifying cleartext signed messages
---

diff --git a/68/cb8f33a3a89ed6f5c2e91e6d4b6219b8c1dd7c b/68/cb8f33a3a89ed6f5c2e91e6d4b6219b8c1dd7c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7b76dada0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/68/cb8f33a3a89ed6f5c2e91e6d4b6219b8c1dd7c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C676DE012F
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2016 04:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0.565
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087,
+  SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id 8zbm3e4WCxKU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+ Fri,  1 Jul 2016 04:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919696DE00C8
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2016 04:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAEF10007F;
+ Fri,  1 Jul 2016 14:58:23 +0300 (EEST)
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+To: Sanel Zukan <sanelz@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: Issue with verifying cleartext signed messages
+In-Reply-To: <87oa6hbr4o.fsf@darkstar.example.net>
+References: <87oa6hbr4o.fsf@darkstar.example.net>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+56~ge2391a7 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
+Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:58:23 +0300
+Message-ID: <m2vb0ph8o0.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:59:19 -0000
+
+On Fri, Jul 01 2016, Sanel Zukan <sanelz@gmail.com> wrote:
+
+> Hi,
+>
+> I'm using epa-verify-cleartext-in-region to verify cleartext signed
+> messages and noticed it will sometimes fail with notmuch, especially
+> when target mail message is part of longer thread.
+>
+> For example, when signed mail is first in thread, body will look like:
+>
+> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+>  <content>
+> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+>  <signature>
+> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+>
+> and epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will correctly capture and verify it.
+> However, when the message is second or third in thread, notmuch will
+> append spaces in front of it, making it looks like this:
+>
+>   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+>    <content>
+>   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+>    <signature>
+>   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+>
+> epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will fail here with: "Invalid cleartext
+> signed message".
+>
+> Error is reproducible - copy the body of message with signature in new
+> buffer, remove starting spaces and epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will
+> work.
+>
+> Any idea how to solve this? Or even better, is it possible to display
+> messages flat, without tree view.
+>
+> If you can, please CC me with reply as I'm not member of this list.
+
+Does pressing '<' in show buffer help ?
+
+Tomi
+
+>
+> Thanks in advace.
+>
+> Best,
+> Sanel