From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:52:29 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: bisect: only check merge bases when needed
X-Git-Tag: v1.6.1-rc1~233^2~1
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c9c4e2d5a25bbf637780f9b83e74c2a26fb957f5;p=git.git

bisect: only check merge bases when needed

When one good revision is not an ancestor of the bad revision, the
merge bases between the good and the bad revision should be checked
to make sure that they are also good revisions.

A previous patch takes care of that, but it may check the merge bases
more often than really needed. In fact the previous patch did not try
to optimize this as much as possible because it is not so simple. So
this is the purpose of this patch.

One may think that when all the merge bases have been checked then
we can save a flag, so that we don't need to check the merge bases
again during the bisect process.

The problem is that the user may choose to checkout and test
something completely different from what the bisect process
suggested. In this case we have to check the merge bases again,
because there may be new merge bases relevant to the bisect
process.

That's why, in this patch, when we detect that the user tested
something else than what the bisect process suggested, we remove
the flag that says that we don't need to check the merge bases
again.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---

diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index b314d4770..69a9a565e 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -172,6 +172,25 @@ bisect_write() {
 	test -n "$nolog" || echo "git bisect $state $rev" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG"
 }
 
+is_expected_rev() {
+	test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
+	test "$1" = $(cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV")
+}
+
+mark_expected_rev() {
+	echo "$1" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV"
+}
+
+check_expected_revs() {
+	for _rev in "$@"; do
+		if ! is_expected_rev "$_rev"; then
+			rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK"
+			rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV"
+			return
+		fi
+	done
+}
+
 bisect_state() {
 	bisect_autostart
 	state=$1
@@ -181,7 +200,8 @@ bisect_state() {
 	1,bad|1,good|1,skip)
 		rev=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) ||
 			die "Bad rev input: HEAD"
-		bisect_write "$state" "$rev" ;;
+		bisect_write "$state" "$rev"
+		check_expected_revs "$rev" ;;
 	2,bad|*,good|*,skip)
 		shift
 		eval=''
@@ -191,7 +211,8 @@ bisect_state() {
 				die "Bad rev input: $rev"
 			eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$sha'; "
 		done
-		eval "$eval" ;;
+		eval "$eval"
+		check_expected_revs "$@" ;;
 	*,bad)
 		die "'git bisect bad' can take only one argument." ;;
 	*)
@@ -321,6 +342,7 @@ bisect_checkout() {
 	_rev="$1"
 	_msg="$2"
 	echo "Bisecting: $_msg"
+	mark_expected_rev "$_rev"
 	git checkout -q "$_rev" || exit
 	git show-branch "$_rev"
 }
@@ -332,18 +354,10 @@ is_among() {
 	return 1
 }
 
-is_testing_merge_base() {
-	grep "^testing $1$" "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES" >/dev/null 2>&1
-}
-
-mark_testing_merge_base() {
-	echo "testing $1" >> "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES"
-}
-
 handle_bad_merge_base() {
 	_badmb="$1"
 	_good="$2"
-	if is_testing_merge_base "$_badmb"; then
+	if is_expected_rev "$_badmb"; then
 		cat >&2 <<EOF
 The merge base $_badmb is bad.
 This means the bug has been fixed between $_badmb and [$_good].
@@ -383,7 +397,6 @@ check_merge_bases() {
 		elif is_among "$_mb" "$_skip"; then
 			handle_skipped_merge_base "$_mb" "$_bad" "$_good"
 		else
-			mark_testing_merge_base "$_mb"
 			bisect_checkout "$_mb" "a merge base must be tested"
 			checkout_done=1
 			return
@@ -392,6 +405,9 @@ check_merge_bases() {
 }
 
 check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad() {
+	test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+		return
+
 	_bad="$1"
 	_good=$(echo $2 | sed -e 's/\^//g')
 	_skip="$3"
@@ -401,8 +417,11 @@ check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad() {
 
 	_side=$(git rev-list $_good ^$_bad)
 	if test -n "$_side"; then
-		check_merge_bases "$_bad" "$_good" "$_skip"
+		check_merge_bases "$_bad" "$_good" "$_skip" || return
+		test "$checkout_done" -eq "1" && return
 	fi
+
+	: > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK"
 }
 
 bisect_next() {
@@ -491,7 +510,8 @@ bisect_clean_state() {
 	do
 		git update-ref -d $ref $hash || exit
 	done
-	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES" &&
+	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
+	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
 	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" &&
 	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
 	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" &&
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index a1ce95c5a..c16311469 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -440,6 +440,30 @@ test_expect_success 'good merge bases when good and bad are siblings' '
 	git bisect reset
 '
 
+check_trace() {
+	grep "$1" "$GIT_TRACE" | grep "\^$2" | grep "$3" >/dev/null
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'optimized merge base checks' '
+	GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/trace.log" &&
+	export GIT_TRACE &&
+	git bisect start "$HASH7" "$SIDE_HASH7" > my_bisect_log.txt &&
+	grep "merge base must be tested" my_bisect_log.txt &&
+	grep "$HASH4" my_bisect_log.txt &&
+	check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH7" "$SIDE_HASH7" &&
+	git bisect good > my_bisect_log2.txt &&
+	test -f ".git/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+	test "$HASH6" = $(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
+	: > "$GIT_TRACE" &&
+	git bisect bad > my_bisect_log3.txt &&
+	test_must_fail check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH6" "$SIDE_HASH7" &&
+	git bisect good "$A_HASH" > my_bisect_log4.txt &&
+	grep "merge base must be tested" my_bisect_log4.txt &&
+	test_must_fail test -f ".git/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+	check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH6" "$A_HASH" &&
+	unset GIT_TRACE
+'
+
 #
 #
 test_done