From: W. Trevor King Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:52 +0000 (-0400) Subject: posts:FRC: add freely rotating chain post. X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c2b2f7b5e537ad8170cf66e8a955f9db5b7e2666;p=mw2txt.git posts:FRC: add freely rotating chain post. --- diff --git a/posts/FRC.mdwn_itex b/posts/FRC.mdwn_itex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c48c08e --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/FRC.mdwn_itex @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +[[!meta title="Freely rotating chains"]] + +[[Velocity clamp force spectroscopy|Force_spectroscopy]] pulls are +[often fit to polymer models][carrionvazquez99] such as the worm-like +chain (WLC). However, [Puchner et al.][puchner08] had the bright idea +that, rather than fitting each loading region with a polymer model, it +is easier to calculate the change in contour length by converting the +abscissa to contour-length space. While the WLC is commonly used, +Puchner gets better fits using the freely rotating chain (FRC) model. + +Computing force-extension curves for either the WLC or FJC is +complicated, and it is common to use interpolation formulas to +estimate the curves. For the WLC, we use [Bustamante's +formula][bustamante94]: + +\[ + F_WLC(x) = \frac{k_B T}{p} \left[ + \frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{1}{\left(1-\frac{x}{L}\right)^2} - 1\right) + + \frac{x}{L} \right] +\] + +For the FRC, Puchner uses [Livadaru][livadaru03]'s equation 46. + +\[ + \frac{R_z}{L} \approx + \begin{cases} + \frac{fa}{3k_B T} & \text{for } \frac{fb}{k_B T} \lt \frac{b}{l} \\ + 1-\left(\frac{fl}{4k_B T}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} + & \text{for } \frac{b}{l} \lt \frac{fb}{k_B T} \lt \frac{l}{b} \\ + 1-\left(\frac{fb}{ck_B T}\right)^{-1} + & \text{for } \frac{l}{b} \lt \frac{fb}{k_B T} + \end{cases}\;. +\] + +Unfortunately, there are two typos in Livadaru's equation 46. It +should read (confirmed by private communication with Roland Netz). + +\[ + \frac{R_z}{L} \approx + \begin{cases} + \frac{fa}{3k_B T} & \text{for } \frac{fb}{k_B T} \lt \frac{b}{l} \\ + 1-\left(\frac{4fl}{k_B T}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} + & \text{for } \frac{b}{l} \lt \frac{fb}{k_B T} \lt \frac{l}{b} \\ + 1-\left(\frac{cfb}{k_B T}\right)^{-1} + & \text{for } \frac{l}{b} \lt \frac{fb}{k_B T} + \end{cases}\;. +\] + +Regardless of the form of Livadaru's equation 46, the suggested FRC +interpolation formula is Livadaru's equation 49, which has continuous +cross-overs between the various regimes and adds the possibility of +elastic backbone extension. + +\[ + \frac{R_z}{L} = 1 - \left\{ + \left(F_\text{WLC}^{-1}\left[\frac{fl}{k_BT}\right]\right)^\beta + + \left(\frac{cfb}{k_BT}\right)^\beta\right\}^{\frac{-1}{\beta}} + + \frac{f}{\tilde{\gamma}} \;, +\] + +where $l=b\frac{\cos(\gamma/2)}{|\ln(\cos\gamma)|}$ (Livadaru's +equation 22) is the effective persistence length, $\beta$ determines +the crossover sharpness, $\tilde{\gamma}$ is the backbone stretching +modulus, and $F_\text{WLC}^{-1}[x]$ is related to the inverse of +Bustamante's interpolation formula, + +\[ + F_\text{WLC}[x] = \frac{3}{4} - \frac{1}{x} + \frac{x^2}{4} \;. +\] + +By matching their interpolation formula with simlated FRCs, Livadaru +suggests using $\beta=2$, $\tilde{\gamma}=\infty$, and $c=2$. In his +paper, Puchner suggests using $b=0.4$ nm and $\gamma=22^{\circ}$. +However, when I contacted him and pointed out the typos in Livadaru's +equation 46, he reran his analysis and got similar results using the +corrected formula with $b=0.11$ nm and $\gamma=41^{\circ}$. This +makes more sense because it gives a WLC persistence length similar to +the one he used when fitting the WLC model: + +\[ + l = b\frac{\cos(\gamma/2)}{|\ln(\cos\gamma)|} = 0.366\text{ nm} +\] + +(vs. his WLC persistence length of $p=0.4$ nm). + +In any event, the two models (WLC and FRC) give similar results for +low to moderate forces, with the differences kicking in as $fb/k_B T$ +moves above $l/b$. For Puchner's revised numbers, this corresponds to + +\[ + f \gt \frac{l}{b} \cdot \frac{k_B T}{b} + = \frac{\cos(\gamma/2)}{|\ln(\cos\gamma)|} \cdot \frac{k_B T}{b} + \approx 122 \text{ pN} \;, +\] + +assuming a temperature in the range of 300 K. + + +[carrionvazquez99]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.20.11288 +[puchner08]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.108.129999 +[bustamante94]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8079175 +[livadaru03]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma020751g + +[[!tag tags/theory]]