From: David Bremner Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:58:29 +0000 (+2100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have been changed on disk X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bf021f2dbcafb87c60d9f0321fbc2efc414fa47f;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have been changed on disk --- diff --git a/23/c2b7008f4d7b408dcf59180c4f437719e4b57a b/23/c2b7008f4d7b408dcf59180c4f437719e4b57a new file mode 100644 index 000000000..205b3773a --- /dev/null +++ b/23/c2b7008f4d7b408dcf59180c4f437719e4b57a @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9F431FBD + for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:58:42 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id qa1KrGASEnv4 for ; + Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE06431FBC + for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1WZ0K9-00048N-4R; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:58:33 -0300 +Received: (nullmailer pid 1288 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 + 15:58:29 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-10 PDT + , + Gaute Hope +Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have been + changed on disk +In-Reply-To: <877g6v3lb9.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +References: <1396800683-9164-1-git-send-email-eg@gaute.vetsj.com> + <87wqf2gqig.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <1397140962-sup-6514@qwerzila> + <87wqexnqvb.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87k3aw5dj5.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <877g6v3lb9.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+180~g8977b1a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:58:29 -0300 +Message-ID: <87mwfq4k0q.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +Cc: notmuch +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:58:42 -0000 + +dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu writes: + +> +> As far as updating the test suite, etc., it's almost certain that the +> core notmuch developers would be unsatisfied with whatever I've done, +> since the code base is very clean and has a very uniform style. So when +> I say I'd want some "indication that such a change could be upstreamed," +> I mean more specifically that someone would be willing to shepherd the +> process of getting the code into shape. +> + +I think it depends on your definition of shepherd. If it means review +your patches and tell you what needs to be done, then we can probably +handle that. Things tend to stall if the patch proposer loses interest +after the first review, so we're pretty far from "fire and forget". + +I'd like to hear one or two more opinions from regular contributors +before I say "yes, this is something we want to do." + +cheers, + +d