From: Mark Walters Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:57 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ba4c75542fb668d5cbb7acbde3a5ab5006e0b0bb;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags --- diff --git a/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d b/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1309779ff --- /dev/null +++ b/0b/12ff2d2195851d8e409527de6dba1a25bd981d @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D879431FBC + for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 1.34 +X-Spam-Level: * +X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id a+Dx4XO6bw2m for ; + Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40038431FAE + for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1YVh3c-0006wn-SU; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:23 +0000 +Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1YVh3c-0007hU-Lg; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:20 +0000 +From: Mark Walters +To: matt@bubblegen.co.uk, notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags +In-Reply-To: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> +References: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+86~gef5e66a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:57 +0000 +Message-ID: <87sidbej46.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162 +X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc, + this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB). +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: 1e6bc1706de76ecbf85241efbec6083f (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.0 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -0.0 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:32 -0000 + + +Hi + +I think that is a bug (my fault) which happened when the unread tag +handling went in. I will try and fix it. + +Incidentally you can scroll the message pane with space and b without +having to switch frames. + +Best wishes + +Mark + +On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Matthew Lear wrote: +> Hi, +> If I switch to viewing a thread with notmuch-tree, I can navigate through, +> and read messages using up/down + RET just fine. Each message is shown in +> a seperate window. However, if point never enters that message window, the +> unread tag is removed (strikethrough) from the message in the notmuch-tree +> view but not from the message in the message window itself. If I refresh +> the notmuch tree view, all messages still have their unread tag applied. +> +> The only time that the unread tag is removed is if point enters the +> message window. For messages that are only a few lines long (eg a reply to +> the previous message in the thread is only a few lines) and which can be +> read without putting point in the message window to scroll, having to +> specifically select the message window in order for the unread tag to be +> removed from the message seems totally unnecessary and is inconvenient. +> +> Is this by design or am I using it wrongly? Is this behaviour configurable? +> +> Cheers, +> -- Matt +> +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch