From: http://lj.rossia.org/users/imz/ Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:41:01 +0000 (-0400) Subject: minor: Fixing the crazy formatting in the prev.edit. X-Git-Tag: 3.13~83^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b859373d67edbc5818295fbbe8ac2c8e74e8d76e;p=ikiwiki.git minor: Fixing the crazy formatting in the prev.edit. --- diff --git a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn index faeb7192a..72bfd8dea 100644 --- a/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/structured_page_data.mdwn @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ See also: >The first use case is handled by having a template in the page creation. You could + + >have some type of form to edit the data, but that's just sugar on top of the template. >If you were going to have a web form to edit the data, I can imagine a few ways to do it: > @@ -247,7 +249,8 @@ in a large number of other cases. > or, if you applied the patch in [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] then you can use 'defined pagespecs' > such as `data_link(Depends on,~openBugs)`. The ability to label links like this allows separation of > dependencies between bugs from arbitrary links. ->> This is issue (the need for distinguished kinds of links) has also been brought up in other discussions: [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies#another_kind_of_links]] (deps vs. links) and [[tag_pagespec_function]] (tags vs. links). --Ivan Z. +>> This issue (the need for distinguished kinds of links) has also been brought up in other discussions: [[tracking_bugs_with_dependencies#another_kind_of_links]] (deps vs. links) and [[tag_pagespec_function]] (tags vs. links). --Ivan Z. + ---- #!/usr/bin/perl