From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:49:19 +0000 (+2000)
Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ae6f71a2119d9a8973ce3191be3e828fc2848960;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
---

diff --git a/3b/10ddcacc42cc0490e1a6eb4707342befa27064 b/3b/10ddcacc42cc0490e1a6eb4707342befa27064
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb9c4cc1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3b/10ddcacc42cc0490e1a6eb4707342befa27064
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84BF6DE0AF8
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:27 -0800 (PST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -0.307
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244,
+  RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id tmbT6eUqGRg4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+ Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:25 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FABF6DE0A9A
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:25 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
+ id 1aUkrf-0001MN-QP; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:48:39 -0500
+Received: (nullmailer pid 3693 invoked by uid 1000);
+ Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:49:19 -0000
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
+To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
+Cc: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
+In-Reply-To: <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
+References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>
+ <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>
+ <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:49:19 -0400
+Message-ID: <8737sw9kvk.fsf@zancas.localnet>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:49:28 -0000
+
+"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:
+
+> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1].  Does that sound right?  Or do
+> folks prefer another name?
+
+I'd like to hear feedback from others about that.
+
+>> It would also need some tests.
+>
+> In tests/, or devel/dtag/tests?  If the latter, how should I handle
+> the test framework?  Symlinks to the main tests/?  Copies?  Sharness
+> submodule?  Other ideas?
+
+in test/
+
+>
+> That seems like something that could be handled independently.  If
+> folks want to set it up, adjusting the !command handler in notmuch.c's
+> main() or adjusting find_command to fall back to =E2=80=9Cthis is probabl=
+y an
+> external command=E2=80=9D seem doable.
+>
+yeah, I guess there's no need to overcomplicate thing. But let's adopt a
+git-style convention of "notmuch-foo" for script names, so we can make
+it more transparent later, if needed.