From: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 19:03:16 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: calibcant/discussion.tex: Fix 'florian95' -> 'florin95' typo
X-Git-Tag: v1.0~258
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa17e207a8e867a28d3f05c9fe0aa2a68fdf9316;p=thesis.git

calibcant/discussion.tex: Fix 'florian95' -> 'florin95' typo
---

diff --git a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
index 700a183..721edbd 100644
--- a/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/discussion.tex
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ where $x_0$ sets the center and $\Gamma$ sets the width of the curve.
 It is unclear whether the references are due to uncertainty about the
 definition of the Lorentzian or to the fact that \cref{eq:model-psd}
 is also peaked and therefore \cref{eq:lorentzian} a potential
-substitute for \cref{eq:model-psd}.  \citet{florian95}
-likely \cref{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian}, as the slope of the
+substitute for \cref{eq:model-psd}.  \citet{florin95}
+likely \emph{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian}, as the slope of the
 fitted \PSD\ in their figure 2, has a slope at $f=0$.
 Using \cref{eq:model-psd}, the derivative would have been zero, as we
 can see by using the chain rule repeatedly,