From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:01:52 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: web commit by http://subvert.org.uk/~bma/: Argument in favour of Varioki over creatin... 
X-Git-Tag: 2.41~193
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a632e366a06c61de7d7a60dbe5d552c65a83d00e;p=ikiwiki.git

web commit by subvert.org.uk/~bma/: Argument in favour of Varioki over creating new plugins to set template variables.
---

diff --git a/doc/todo/varioki_--_add_template_variables___40__with_closures_for_values__41___in_ikiwiki.setup.mdwn b/doc/todo/varioki_--_add_template_variables___40__with_closures_for_values__41___in_ikiwiki.setup.mdwn
index 431305622..c5fe28f4b 100644
--- a/doc/todo/varioki_--_add_template_variables___40__with_closures_for_values__41___in_ikiwiki.setup.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/varioki_--_add_template_variables___40__with_closures_for_values__41___in_ikiwiki.setup.mdwn
@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ ManojSrivastava
                       },
 </pre>
 
+> > I'd argue in favour of this plugin; it's true that a simple plugin can be
+> > used to set a template variable, but that makes it necessary to write a new
+> > plugin for every variable (or set of variables) that are needed. In that
+> > kind of situation, I don't think bypassing the plugin mechanism is a bad
+> > thing, unless an ever-growing collection of plugins to set one or two
+> > variables is a good thing.
+> >
+> > --[[bma]]
+
 ----
 
 <pre>