From: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/ <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/@web>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:44:46 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Comments and links
X-Git-Tag: 2.66~82
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a0b53cf26b3d72d06cfa6b20de764ad2d0ae7f06;p=ikiwiki.git

Comments and links
---

diff --git a/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn b/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn
index 628a67fc8..1a810ad55 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn
@@ -44,7 +44,18 @@ be embedded to the source code repository commit messages.
 >> look like a wikipage anymore, but rather something like the Debian 
 >> BTS web-interface, but it would still benefit from wikilinks to the 
 >> documentation in the wiki etc.
->>
+
+>>> I think it is useful to look at these things separately:
+>>>
+>>> * Bug numbers: See above.
+>>> * Automatic timestamps on comments: this already exists with the inline directive.
+>>> * Email interface: You can certainly get an rss feed of what changes in the wiki.
+>>> * You didn't mention [[todo/structured_page_data]] but that is, I think, part
+>>>     of what you seem to be saying.
+>>> * [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] is also important.
+>>>
+>>> -- [[Will]]
+
 >> About the commit message interface: I was thinking about a project
 >> architecture where the code is kept in a separate revision control
 >> system branch than the metadata (blog, wiki, BTS). This would IMHO