From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 23:34:35 +0000 (+2100)
Subject: Re: notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9267ea8f0043a44996d643dc0794fb98ae11a904;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored
---

diff --git a/0a/3c05d08cc3223354b037aae62d52c855fab4d7 b/0a/3c05d08cc3223354b037aae62d52c855fab4d7
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..72406e43b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0a/3c05d08cc3223354b037aae62d52c855fab4d7
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D21F431FBC
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 16:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
+	autolearn=disabled
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
+	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+	with ESMTP id rVVClWHHGcUJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+	Tue, 27 May 2014 16:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])
+	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994A2431FB6
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 16:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)
+	(envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
+	id 1WpQtD-00033S-Bh; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:34:39 -0300
+Received: (nullmailer pid 21083 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 27 May 2014
+	23:34:35 -0000
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
+To: Andreas Amann <a.amann@ucc.ie>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: notmuch new: emails with BOM are ignored
+In-Reply-To: <874n0b4o16.fsf@msstf091.ucc.ie>
+References: <874n0b4o16.fsf@msstf091.ucc.ie>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
+	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 20:34:35 -0300
+Message-ID: <878upmn6d0.fsf@zancas.localnet>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 23:34:52 -0000
+
+Andreas Amann <a.amann@ucc.ie> writes:
+
+>
+> Could this be a bug in notmuch? Possible emails with BOM are not "legal"
+> anyhow, but in my opinion it would be better to simply ignore the BOM.
+>
+> I am using notmuch 0.18.
+
+As of 0.18 notmuch is using the gmime mail parser exclusively. It could be a
+bug/feature of the gmime library that it rejects such files.
+
+I've tagged this as a wishlist bug / feature request for now, until
+somebody has a chance to track down where exactly the issue is, and how
+hard it would be to fix.
+
+d