From: Felipe Contreras Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 13:09:37 +0000 (+1900) Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f0bd1e7a325672986756ceaf57ca92450323262;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) --- diff --git a/41/5691d3952ce247e4b253fd9ade394495606260 b/41/5691d3952ce247e4b253fd9ade394495606260 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9211faaee --- /dev/null +++ b/41/5691d3952ce247e4b253fd9ade394495606260 @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0292431FBC + for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 06:09:47 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id DntpevwaP-MW for ; + Fri, 9 May 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com (mail-yh0-f50.google.com + [209.85.213.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691DE431FBF + for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 06:09:42 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 29so3665861yhl.23 + for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject + :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; + bh=LIFshFd/tgqyxwJ6O3jxsODqVM1wrcYUV/lMBzsEH74=; + b=Pg1koQFefdGw0BBavPLpIZr8TLplF9MobytaThU00FDHBa3g7ZDHIBMQzi4MREu2JG + 5+l5tRVj9MKGDAmuSAUz08o0uol0Jhuq/TsYes06gJP6YWPioNDmqqJPvmvWCrSLzrdA + FaJAg2FS90fh9u9sbQ8SEl5pSu9ZofE0xvHSTjI2woDaemveVispPdHpW8Cq92urSdL0 + cHGcdcIDoiRsBdOm4sITnC13292CaXaN4GnWpFlLY/4oudX3952cDZN9Tg3QfwTGOohk + Vsw7HQdERX5dMhcbH0wg2JYoOD/NXzJl2+c2Xt55uCsqc++9XdluA50365PfJFWtLvst + sXjA== +X-Received: by 10.236.203.225 with SMTP id f61mr240223yho.51.1399640981877; + Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n65sm6091941yhc.8.2014.05.09.06.09.39 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Fri, 09 May 2014 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 08:09:37 -0500 +From: Felipe Contreras +To: Suvayu Ali , + Felipe Contreras +Message-ID: <536cd39189c55_4ea9112f308ab@nysa.notmuch> +In-Reply-To: <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org> +References: + + + <20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net> + <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us> + <20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508233530.GV28634@odin.tremily.us> + <20140509113951.GD2634@chitra.no-ip.org> + <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch> + <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org> +Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) +Mime-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 13:09:48 -0000 + +Suvayu Ali wrote: +> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: +> > Suvayu Ali wrote: +> > +> > > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to +> > > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have: +> > > +> > > Requires: notmuch >= +> > > +> > > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency based on +> > > official version numbers. With more bindings, many with different +> > > version dependencies, this becomes quite cumbersome; +> > +> > No, it doesn't: +> > +> > %package notmuch-ruby +> > Requires: notmuch = %{version}-%{release}, ruby +> +> Doesn't that work when you have one spec file for all sub-packages (as I +> do now)? I was responding to Trevor's suggestion about not having +> sub-packages, IOW, different spec files for different packages. + +Ah. I don't see why anybody would want different spec files for +different subpackages. + +-- +Felipe Contreras