From: David Mazieres Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:07:34 +0000 (+1700) Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=78886794fc453b07d3e31df4768c5cb349712451;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues --- diff --git a/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3 b/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4ae7f264b --- /dev/null +++ b/f1/fd38d588bcb1a3ef75390f10057fa1950be7e3 @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +Return-Path: + +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624FC431FAF + for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:45 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.3 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id v4pdr9kHARM3 for ; + Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46D8431FAE + for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu + [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id + s3I07Y6O014355; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT) +Received: (from dm@localhost) + by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s3I07Y4t009194; + Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT) +X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to + return-wjwb7w6bbxy77dhqms2eum4pp6@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f +From: David Mazieres +To: Allan Streib +Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues +In-Reply-To: <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +References: <871twvokwm.fsf@viking.indiana.edu> + <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 +Message-ID: <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-16 PDT + +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:07:45 -0000 + +David Bremner writes: + +> Allan Streib writes: +> +>> I've been using notmuch on OpenBSD for a while, and I really appreciate +>> the project. + +Since there is a thread on this... + +I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is +that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because +I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second +per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for +new mail: + + Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.). + Added 5 new messages to the database. + +Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues? + +David