From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:16:02 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=762ac1c081aab2c676b1006e58c32422413000ab;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID
---

diff --git a/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092 b/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c83c2eca4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/66/56daa2caf81784b8072ab0de6620c8a31c7092
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529A46DE140C
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:54 -0800 (PST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0.663
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, 
+ SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id 5YKtDOeL1XKt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+ Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:52 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52D26DE0C66
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 08:15:50 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A0C100080;
+ Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:16:02 +0200 (EET)
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+To: Erik Quaeghebeur <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net>,
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: Message-ID's vs. Resent-Message-ID
+In-Reply-To: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad>
+References: <2154153.mZhPRoAGrk@sysoppad>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+32~g73439f8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
+Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:16:02 +0200
+Message-ID: <m2a8odcsvx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:15:54 -0000
+
+On Sun, Jan 10 2016, Erik Quaeghebeur <notmuch@equaeghe.nospammail.net> wrote:
+
+> Hi,
+>
+>
+> I've become interested in notmuch. After looking at the documentation of
+> the Python bindings, I have the following questions:
+
+> * Is it correct that a message's Message-ID used as its unique key in the
+> notmuch database?
+
+yes
+
+> * If yes, is it correct that two messages with the same Message-ID, but
+> with different contents/other headers, will have only one entry in the
+> database?
+
+yes
+
+> * If yes, for resent messages
+> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.6), does notmuch use
+> (the chronologically last) Resent-Message-ID, or the Message-ID?
+
+the Message-ID
+
+>
+>
+> Best,
+
+likewise :)
+
+>
+> Erik
+
+
+Tomi