From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:35:35 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Re: Proposal: List-Id
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b2ad8e443dc6448ce0c26000830238a3ba663dc;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: Proposal: List-Id
---

diff --git a/98/e113afb753be3bcfdefb9021be39c3fb45a748 b/98/e113afb753be3bcfdefb9021be39c3fb45a748
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..85dd5a1f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/98/e113afb753be3bcfdefb9021be39c3fb45a748
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBE2431FCF
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 2.438
+X-Spam-Level: **
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5
+	tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
+	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+	with ESMTP id q-4HJeHD9tJ4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net
+	[87.98.215.224])
+	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E336431FB6
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim
+	4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
+	id 1YXTJE-0000uv-PW; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:35:48 +0000
+Received: (nullmailer pid 7965 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Mar 2015
+	11:35:35 -0000
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
+To: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: Proposal: List-Id
+In-Reply-To: <87wq2huan3.fsf@setec.io>
+References: <87wq2huan3.fsf@setec.io>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+67~gdbe9924 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
+	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:35:35 +0100
+Message-ID: <878uex2n08.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:36:43 -0000
+
+Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io> writes:
+>
+> The standard for identifying mailing lists seems to be List-Id, as per
+> RFC 2919.  I can understand the desire to keep the number of headers
+> included in the header block low, but I wonder if this might be a common
+> enough use-case to suggest its inclusion.
+>
+
+I think the real blocker at this point is that some copies of a message
+may have list-id header and some not. Currently we only index the first
+copy of a message that arrives. Indexing all copies would probably be a
+good step in any case, but e.g. handling deletion of files requires some
+care in that case.
+
+d