From: Amadeusz Żołnowski Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 20:00:49 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Re: miraculous from: field X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=693de4313e8fa6c71597b5ed19cccf0b30cd0ea8;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: miraculous from: field --- diff --git a/13/5c39f7e90b8d31040c0b3e35d006f47459512f b/13/5c39f7e90b8d31040c0b3e35d006f47459512f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2e005e0b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/13/5c39f7e90b8d31040c0b3e35d006f47459512f @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF84B431FAF + for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 13:00:59 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id pmjG+omJqKjc for ; + Wed, 8 May 2013 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com + [74.125.83.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + 58D3C431FAE for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 13:00:55 -0700 + (PDT) +Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d4so93105eek.28 + for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 13:00:54 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent + :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=6Y6AcjM4xtNZwiUoSx3G02ZInGcSWdgNcrAWG4491So=; + b=Ap5bQ5YmhpKpfduhywwQc7NI25ZjI7Yq0hw+Ln3D6RmUW7hNl3AysYgjAYyoumYq7G + i2pjBSYz1+pjA3s7OM5o3hJ6rTjcMbuz3diOgbkJ01KHEdMIhUb2Mfz+STOyRQWHqwzS + kF/j3r8lHxfXCGqBsFhLfaD7iimyKfQzpvjNAWmrIRCGuYMFNALZVV3yyYxfUq6Bj8hn + Jawa+uhQFo9Y0h4BL70vgDUAancNLKuXLqXsSIhoV59rQgQk+KCABS/xa97tyNLBj3Mv + 5igx6629QdV8oSB9tGpBtGDDxmh5YJHyqvRB8vYWs++BcUvTUGRwaoyHrqhYDB1lGVlt + X0lg== +X-Received: by 10.15.82.201 with SMTP id a49mr20485607eez.44.1368043252892; + Wed, 08 May 2013 13:00:52 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (89-77-133-184.dynamic.chello.pl. [89.77.133.184]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm59392eeo.0.2013.05.08.13.00.51 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Wed, 08 May 2013 13:00:52 -0700 (PDT) +From: Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?xbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= +To: Adam Wolfe Gordon +Subject: Re: miraculous from: field +In-Reply-To: + +References: + + +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 22:00:49 +0200 +Message-ID: + <87ip2ts0lq.fsf@raeviah.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; + micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQnXEpVgxftmjBuHAwCMOa+8g9n0AVtDgYhOHrmWULfk+qGo/vNeQTwXzN66x/Z5ybf5hlsK +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 20:01:00 -0000 + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + + +Hi! + +I am resurrecting quite an old thread=E2=80=A6 + +Adam Wolfe Gordon writes: + +> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: +>> The reply template comes from 'notmuch reply' cli command, while the +>> forwarding is internal to the emacs ui. I don't have any quick solutions, +>> but perhaps in the long run we should do the forwarding template in the = +cli +>> too. +> +> I think this is the right approach. Someone suggested a while ago that +> we have a notmuch compose, which would do new message creation (for +> frontends that can't do it themselves), reply, and forward in one +> place. It would probably support raw and JSON like the current reply +> does. +> +> Something I'll do if I find some time, but would be happy to see +> someone else work on :-). + +It seems nobody has done work yet. Could you reconsider adding this +feature? I am really looking forward to it and I think I am not alone. + + +Regards, + +=2D-=20 +Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) + +iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRiq7yAAoJEPATRTHh2/q14KgIAKSd4soLMRrEFjs1FCjvsmDv +BuJgyNfOLpUPDyRtBlfMhdewaiod1BeJbINRhLJ55WrdC507skk6PIXD20tsEExw +1kZoVSNCJFzcoTwHcOiubEbVPP0ma++zvlHHVvRfNTHp1FO+ytWVp5jpvr+CUumN +nwbNV/zUwHvnsJTaPHIljaZWUGWqcMAWVwi/TAPJxRAkupo/1puYQnk1CwKJO5eZ +I9Z4H/BObdP04pSRUZXnlDjw39CJIPNBng5HLTG7PlqsTwgMvjKxi8NLg1rLShO/ +Pml2mxIF29b8yCucneuvuGIstHXQ4UzUXBRD0hCGELiNWHgiuOV3KvwAlboMHZs= +=7uH/ +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--=-=-=--