From: Suvayu Ali Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:50:04 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6931e57f573e245c3373408e77d7f3ef92754793;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) --- diff --git a/b5/14c67dc19e0896c219a65f3de7f71d18ad6b61 b/b5/14c67dc19e0896c219a65f3de7f71d18ad6b61 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e14edb486 --- /dev/null +++ b/b5/14c67dc19e0896c219a65f3de7f71d18ad6b61 @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898DF431FC2 + for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id GEQobLQxDxcv for ; + Fri, 9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com + [74.125.83.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + 972FA431FBC for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700 + (PDT) +Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e53so2634274eek.8 + for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to + :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=IUK//qR2s0X8RHBoB1+VZbGZoDGMhL4exMY8viUUcbk=; + b=eQ3x+AnWPLWPTJZCrR1ijqyNVTy08Am/e3w+W82KS5kYXN8GLX0Muif7aAVT5PFpSl + haAorblQJcS9+dN4RVxaY22+v0rpjovNhvOt9jl5Y8B/x1EwkIRAIUSbXK7ab8Mfjlu5 + CB/oMUPYXS/EWC4ROXnqjQR6VyIPP0J846iMsi28S93fJjIvx3S5LnwbgGZYE+wf8LVx + IaHb+kx6CwnLj4hr6J1cYaKFlJMk0XXHvr24SVQnHmpuPOjupJSXd60nJhcJ26fy+YeM + aJOF/YvU5dQroPsyauPTQ/XO8zxAFap63AqxEitVWA9PvENYLk7zTAlK7loD4vHu+8gT + U0Fg== +X-Received: by 10.15.35.66 with SMTP id f42mr13071037eev.93.1399639807082; + Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from chitra.no-ip.org ([2001:610:120:3001:2ad2:44ff:fe4a:b029]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm9482736eeg.28.2014.05.09.05.50.06 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT) +Sender: Suvayu Ali +Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:50:04 +0200 +From: Suvayu Ali +To: Felipe Contreras +Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?) +Message-ID: <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org> +Mail-Followup-To: Felipe Contreras , + notmuch@notmuchmail.org +References: + + + <20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net> + <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us> + <20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org> + <20140508233530.GV28634@odin.tremily.us> + <20140509113951.GD2634@chitra.no-ip.org> + <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:50:13 -0000 + +On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: +> Suvayu Ali wrote: +> +> > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to +> > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have: +> > +> > Requires: notmuch >= +> > +> > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency based on +> > official version numbers. With more bindings, many with different +> > version dependencies, this becomes quite cumbersome; +> +> No, it doesn't: +> +> %package notmuch-ruby +> Requires: notmuch = %{version}-%{release}, ruby + +Doesn't that work when you have one spec file for all sub-packages (as I +do now)? I was responding to Trevor's suggestion about not having +sub-packages, IOW, different spec files for different packages. + +-- +Suvayu + +Open source is the future. It sets us free.