From: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 16:20:41 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Use 'behavior' instead of 'behaviour'
X-Git-Tag: v1.0~136
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=62c3c7db1663f17313f17467e453c24ba53fd178;p=thesis.git

Use 'behavior' instead of 'behaviour'

US instead of British spelling.  Thanks Mom!
---

diff --git a/outline.org b/outline.org
index 2b02850..09028c3 100644
--- a/outline.org
+++ b/outline.org
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
         http://www.weibull.com/LifeDataWeb/nonparametric_analysis.htm
 * Measurements
 ** Temperature dependent energy landscape roughness
-** Effect of cantilever stiffness on unfolding behaviour
+** Effect of cantilever stiffness on unfolding behavior
 * Software
 ** Experiment control/analysis software
 ** Sawsim
diff --git a/src/calibcant/overview.tex b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
index b99cfa5..cd42014 100644
--- a/src/calibcant/overview.tex
+++ b/src/calibcant/overview.tex
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ the peak (where $x=x_0$).
 
 It is unclear whether the ``Lorentzian'' references are due to
 uncertainty about the definition of the Lorentzian or to the fact that
-the two equations have similar behaviour near the
+the two equations have similar behavior near the
 peak.  \citet{florin95} likely \emph{are} using \cref{eq:lorentzian},
 as the slope of the fitted \PSD\ in their \fref{figure}{2}, has a
 slope at $f=0$.  If they were using \cref{eq:psd-Vp}, the derivative