From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:45:07 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: address completion, allow sender/recipient and filters
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5f3f8915aeb442949d689d29e2608107e7627b69;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: [PATCH] emacs: address completion, allow sender/recipient and filters
---

diff --git a/05/91a6fa388758818287fc481d6245b60ff49783 b/05/91a6fa388758818287fc481d6245b60ff49783
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bb8028e81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/05/91a6fa388758818287fc481d6245b60ff49783
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A07A6DE01F9
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0.59
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, 
+ SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id JNeVRksPlT7u for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+ Thu, 19 May 2016 07:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF1E6DE00F5
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
+ by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09401000B3
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 17:45:07 +0300 (EEST)
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: address completion,
+ allow sender/recipient and filters
+In-Reply-To: <87r3czo8g9.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
+References: <8737pg99zz.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
+ <1463558813-23603-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
+ <87r3czo8g9.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+26~g2adc7d1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
+ (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
+ $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
+ !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
+Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:45:07 +0300
+Message-ID: <m2posihzt8.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:45:34 -0000
+
+On Wed, May 18 2016, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
+
+> On Wed, May 18 2016, Mark Walters wrote:
+>> This commit lets the user customize the address completion. It makes
+>> two changes.
+>
+> Thanks Mark, now it LGTM.
+>
+> I configured my address completion to be based on received emails and
+> I'm surprised how many variations of my email address is used by
+> spammers :)
+
+I tried this and it seems to work. LGTM +1.
+
+Thanks to David's latest pushes I grabbed a little time from my temporarily
+busy time and attempted to test this internal address completion...
+
+... for anyone who might be interested, the address harvesting command options
+from emacs (without extra filtering) now are.
+
+notmuch 'address' '--format=sexp' '--format-version=2' \
+'--output=recipients' '--deduplicate=address' 'from:me@example.org'
+
+notmuch 'address' '--format=sexp' '--format-version=2' \
+'--output=sender' '--deduplicate=address' 'to:me@example.org'
+
+... I had text here wondering whether this from:/to: is too restrictive
+but perhaps it is not. I don't know. Therefore I shut up now :D
+
+
+Tomi
+
+
+
+> Cheers
+> -Michal