From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:21:56 +0000 (+2000)
Subject: Re: emacs compatibility?
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=570513642127feebb5e1d6925e18abbab746ede4;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: emacs compatibility?
---

diff --git a/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025 b/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d272dca53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/93/43bc7067a71834b4a88681842934738a4b0025
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217B4431FBC
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:09 -0800 (PST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
+	autolearn=disabled
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
+	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+	with ESMTP id MTawZ5lvNrRB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])
+	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9C4431FB6
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)
+	(envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
+	id 1VlIaW-0008WC-JS; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:22:00 -0400
+Received: (nullmailer pid 1765 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 26 Nov 2013
+	13:21:56 -0000
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch mailing list
+	<notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+Subject: Re: emacs compatibility?
+In-Reply-To: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
+References: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
+	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:21:56 -0400
+Message-ID: <87r4a35mdn.fsf@zancas.localnet>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:22:09 -0000
+
+Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
+
+> i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian
+> contains the following stanza:
+>
+> ------------
+> * This package currently works only with emacs 23.  Users of 
+>   pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems.
+> ------------
+>
+> I'm using notmuch (and notmuch-emacs) 0.16 with emacs24, and i don't
+> think i'm seeing any such problems.  But maybe i'm just lucky and/or
+> conservative and don't happen to tickle any of the incompatibilities?
+>
+> Or is the above README (which is dated from 2011) stale?  If so, as a
+> user i'd appreciate an update that reflect the current expectations of
+> the notmuch development community about which versions of emacs are
+> considered well-supported for the upcoming 0.17 release.
+
+Yeah, emacs24 is fine with 0.17~pre-whatever.  Someone(TM) should update
+that README.
+
+d