From: W. Trevor King Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:04:56 +0000 (-0400) Subject: sawsim/discussion.tex: Cleanup modeling evolution paragraph X-Git-Tag: v1.0~169 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=52f3d343bc991018958f940cb0ba99dcace75dd2;p=thesis.git sawsim/discussion.tex: Cleanup modeling evolution paragraph Mom pointed out a missing 'in' and the 'simper' -> 'simpler' typo. She also liked "2000's" better than "`00's". I changed the Hänggi references to use the new \xref command. --- diff --git a/src/sawsim/discussion.tex b/src/sawsim/discussion.tex index 0a9f8c0..6c0178f 100644 --- a/src/sawsim/discussion.tex +++ b/src/sawsim/discussion.tex @@ -603,10 +603,10 @@ is how we use it here. \subsection{Evolution of unfolding modeling} -Evans introduced the saddle-point Kramers' approximation in a protein unfolding context 1997 (\citet{evans97} Eqn.~3). -However, early work on mechanical unfolding focused on the simper Bell model\citep{rief97a}.%TODO -In the early `00's, the saddle-point/steepest-descent approximation to Kramer's model (\citet{hanggi90} Eqn.~4.56c) was introduced into our field\citep{dudko03,hyeon03}.%TODO -By the mid `00's, the full-blown double-integral form of Kramer's model (\citet{hanggi90} Eqn.~4.56b) was in use\citep{schlierf06}.%TODO +Evans introduced the saddle-point Kramers' approximation in a protein unfolding context in 1997 (\citet{evans97} Eqn.~3). +However, early work on mechanical unfolding focused on the simpler Bell model\citep{rief97a}.%TODO +In the early 2000's, the saddle-point/steepest-descent approximation to Kramer's model (\xref{hanggi90}{equation}{4.56c}) was introduced into our field\citep{dudko03,hyeon03}.%TODO +By the mid 2000's, the full-blown double-integral form of Kramer's model (\xref{hanggi90}{equation}{4.56b}) was in use\citep{schlierf06}.%TODO There have been some tangential attempts towards even fancier models. \citet{dudko03} attempted to reduce the restrictions of the single-unfolding-path model.