From: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:32:24 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: pyafm/discussion.tex: Add red/blue comments to all LabVIEW captions
X-Git-Tag: v1.0~30
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4613208a1fe3ed58d5783945aafbfa9b8d6f08a4;p=thesis.git

pyafm/discussion.tex: Add red/blue comments to all LabVIEW captions

Also make it more explicit that it was only these comparison curves
that were not isolated.
---

diff --git a/src/pyafm/discussion.tex b/src/pyafm/discussion.tex
index 89ca03b..61fcaf8 100644
--- a/src/pyafm/discussion.tex
+++ b/src/pyafm/discussion.tex
@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ hardware.
     \caption{\protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:single:contact}The
       contact region from a single pull from
       \protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:many}.  The
-      LabVIEW/Windows stack takes $0.5\U{nm}$ piezo steps with ten
-      deflection reads at each step.  The Comedi/Linux stack makes a
-      single read per step, but can take as many small steps as
-      possible within DAQ card's memory buffer, frequency, and
+      LabVIEW/Windows stack (blue) takes $0.5\U{nm}$ piezo steps with
+      ten deflection reads at each step.  The Comedi/Linux stack (red)
+      makes a single read per step, but can take as many small steps
+      as possible within DAQ card's memory buffer, frequency, and
       precision limitations.  For $1\U{$\mu$m/s}$ pulls, a
       stepping/sampling frequency of $50\U{kHz}$ generated steps that
       were less than one DAC bit wide.}
@@ -58,11 +58,13 @@ hardware.
         figures/labview-comparison/single-non-contact}}
     \caption{\protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:single:non-contact}The
       non-contact region from a single pull from
-      \protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:many}.  The signal
-      oscillates because the AFM is sitting directly on the lab bench,
-      our usual isolation mechanisms being unavailable at the time.
-      All protein unfolding experiments were carried out with
-      isolation, so the vibration was not a problem in those cases.}
+      \protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:many} using both
+      the LabVIEW/Windows stack (blue) and the Comedi/Linux stack
+      (red).  The signal oscillates because the AFM is sitting
+      directly on the lab bench, our usual isolation mechanisms being
+      unavailable when these curves were recorded.  All protein
+      unfolding experiments were carried out with isolation, so the
+      vibration was not a problem in those cases.}
   \end{center}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -84,8 +86,9 @@ non-contact noise.
       \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{%
         figures/labview-comparison/non-contact-noise}} \\
     \caption{\protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:contact-slope}Contact
-      slope for the pull in \cref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison}.  The
-      low-slope outlier is from the pull with out-of-range
+      slope for the pull in \cref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison} using
+      both the LabVIEW/Windows stack (blue) and the Comedi/Linux stack
+      (red).  The low-slope outlier is from the pull with out-of-range
       deflection.
       \protect\subref{fig:pyafm:labview-comparison:non-contact-noise}Power
       spectral densities (PSDs) of the non-contact noise for the pulls