From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:07:19 +0000 (+2000)
Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3fe0693498d434d7a5a72fe5eb5f564bc7f2426e;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To
---

diff --git a/8b/60086974361eaca78c71220d76e716223bcb61 b/8b/60086974361eaca78c71220d76e716223bcb61
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..021795d64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8b/60086974361eaca78c71220d76e716223bcb61
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D276DE143A
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:26 -0800 (PST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -0.325
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226,
+  RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id E8lm72Fybk8v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+ Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:24 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F57E6DE1413
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:24 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
+ (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
+ id 1a4p8w-00079S-65; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:07:18 -0500
+Received: (nullmailer pid 6172 invoked by uid 1000);
+ Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:07:19 -0000
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
+To: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To
+In-Reply-To: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me>
+References: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me>
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+7~g55fb7da (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:07:19 -0400
+Message-ID: <87610e8ljc.fsf@zancas.localnet>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:07:26 -0000
+
+Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me> writes:
+
+> Hi,
+>
+> I've the impression that notmuch-reply doesn't respect the Reply-To
+> field: I've an email with a Reply-To field. But when I execute "notmuch
+> reply id:<msg-id>", the To: field is set to the From: field of the
+> original email and not to the Reply-To: field.
+>
+
+Hmm. The following test suggests it doesn't ignore reply-to completely.
+Maybe there is some side-effect from --reply-to=sender. What if you try
+omitting that?
+
+test_begin_subtest "Support for Reply-To"
+add_message '[from]="Sender <sender@example.com>"' \
+	     [to]=test_suite@notmuchmail.org \
+	     [subject]=notmuch-reply-test \
+	    '[date]="Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000"' \
+	    '[body]="support for reply-to"' \
+	    '[reply-to]="Sender <elsewhere@example.com>"'
+
+output=$(notmuch reply id:${gen_msg_id})
+test_expect_equal "$output" "From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>
+Subject: Re: notmuch-reply-test
+To: Sender <elsewhere@example.com>
+In-Reply-To: <${gen_msg_id}>
+References: <${gen_msg_id}>
+
+On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000, Sender <sender@example.com> wrote:
+> support for reply-to"
+