From: Tomi Ollila Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:58:48 +0000 (+0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: add function to resend message to new recipients X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2efa56d426b8e85bea68811d4d6f0bbb4be41edd;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: add function to resend message to new recipients --- diff --git a/5c/a9bf5a73285e8424c2bb092a4c92e3310d35cd b/5c/a9bf5a73285e8424c2bb092a4c92e3310d35cd new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0ff3b5c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/5c/a9bf5a73285e8424c2bb092a4c92e3310d35cd @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4031A6DE1512 + for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 1.204 +X-Spam-Level: * +X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.192, + SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id Y5mbZp5K8qK8 for ; + Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:00:22 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC76DE14FD + for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:00:20 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) + by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAE710005A; + Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:58:49 +0300 (EEST) +From: Tomi Ollila +To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: add function to resend message to new + recipients +In-Reply-To: <87vbbxrl3g.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +References: <1440619626-18768-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> + <1440619626-18768-2-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> + <87vbbxrl3g.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+68~g0c35549 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 + (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) +X-Face: HhBM'cA~ +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:00:24 -0000 + +On Sun, Aug 30 2015, David Bremner wrote: + +> Tomi Ollila writes: +> +>> The new function notmuch-show-message-resend re-sends +>> message to new recipients using #'message-resend. +>> +>> Recipients are read from minibuffer as a comma-separated +>> string (with some keyboard support including tab completion). +>> +> +> I couldn't get the tab completion to work, at least if I go +> +> M-x notmuch-show-resend-message +> +> nor when evaluating (notmuch-address-from-minibuffer "foo:") +> +> Do I need to bind a key to test this? + +Nope. both of the above should work -- and worked for me just now +(this is how I tested just now: + + emacs -q -L $PWD/emacs -l emacs/notmuch.el -f notmuch --eval '(progn (setq notmuch-address-command "nottoomuch-addresses.sh") (notmuch-address-message-insinuate))' + +) + +>> I remember that Emacs VM might have had 'b' bound to this functionality +>> but I cannot be sure. A few weeks ago I looked gnus, rmail & mh-e to +>> figure out whether 'b' would have been bound to similar functionality +>> there but I cannot find it... +> +> mutt uses 'b'. AFAICT, gnus uses some sequence ending in b to resend +> bounced messages (i.e. from mailer-daemon). +> +> quoting the manual: +> +> S D b +> +> If you have sent a mail, but the mail was bounced back to you for +> some reason (wrong address, transient failure), you can use this +> command to resend that bounced mail +> (gnus-summary-resend-bounced-mail). [...] +> +> S D r +> +> Not to be confused with the previous command, +> gnus-summary-resend-message will prompt you for an address to send +> the current message off to, and then send it to that place. [...] +> +> Be that as it may, we already use 'r' for reply, and I'm not sure we +> want to go (more) in the way of multi-letter sequences. + +I agree that we don't want to to multi-letter sequences (early). I +personally would be fine w/ 'b'... + +Tomi