From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:54:31 +0000 (+0200) Subject: t1507: add tests to document @{upstream} behaviour X-Git-Tag: v1.7.11-rc0~106^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1b4aee94aaffd5e6fdf3020434b3fa6f0c5cfb2b;p=git.git t1507: add tests to document @{upstream} behaviour In preparation for future changes, add tests which show error messages with @{upstream} in various conditions: - test branch@{u} with . as remote - check error message for branch@{u} on a branch with * no upstream, * on a branch with a configured upstream which doesn't have a remote-tracking branch - check error message for branch@{u} when branch 'branch' does not exist - check error message for @{u} without the branch name Right now the messages are very similar, but various cases can and will be distinguished. Note: test_i18ncmp is not used, because currently error output is not internationalized. test_cmp will be switched to test_i18ncmp in a later patch, when error messages are internationalized. Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh index a4555510c..c4981ba40 100755 --- a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh +++ b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh @@ -15,10 +15,18 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' test_commit 3 && (cd clone && test_commit 4 && - git branch --track my-side origin/side) - + git branch --track my-side origin/side && + git branch --track local-master master && + git remote add -t master master-only .. && + git fetch master-only && + git branch bad-upstream && + git config branch.bad-upstream.remote master-only && + git config branch.bad-upstream.merge refs/heads/side + ) ' +sq="'" + full_name () { (cd clone && git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name "$@") @@ -29,6 +37,11 @@ commit_subject () { git show -s --pretty=format:%s "$@") } +error_message () { + (cd clone && + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify "$@") +} + test_expect_success '@{upstream} resolves to correct full name' ' test refs/remotes/origin/master = "$(full_name @{upstream})" ' @@ -78,7 +91,6 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout -b new my-side@{u} forks from the same' ' test_expect_success 'merge my-side@{u} records the correct name' ' ( - sq="'\''" && cd clone || exit git checkout master || exit git branch -D new ;# can fail but is ok @@ -107,6 +119,69 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout other@{u}' ' test_cmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success 'branch@{u} works when tracking a local branch' ' + test refs/heads/master = "$(full_name local-master@{u})" +' + +test_expect_success 'branch@{u} error message when no upstream' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}non-tracking${sq} + fatal: Needed a single revision + EOF + error_message non-tracking@{u} 2>actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success '@{u} error message when no upstream' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}${sq} + fatal: Needed a single revision + EOF + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify @{u} 2>actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'branch@{u} error message with misspelt branch' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}no-such-branch${sq} + fatal: Needed a single revision + EOF + error_message no-such-branch@{u} 2>actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success '@{u} error message when not on a branch' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}${sq} + fatal: Needed a single revision + EOF + git checkout HEAD^0 && + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify @{u} 2>actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'branch@{u} error message if upstream branch not fetched' ' + cat >expect <<-EOF && + error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}bad-upstream${sq} + fatal: Needed a single revision + EOF + error_message bad-upstream@{u} 2>actual && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success 'pull works when tracking a local branch' ' +( + cd clone && + git checkout local-master && + git pull +) +' + +# makes sense if the previous one succeeded +test_expect_success '@{u} works when tracking a local branch' ' + test refs/heads/master = "$(full_name @{u})" +' + cat >expect <)