From: http://jcflack.myopenid.com/ Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:55:46 +0000 (-0400) Subject: (no commit message) X-Git-Tag: 2.60~141 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=19d8acaa95ee252e3ca2bff956ad8b5d951f1381;p=ikiwiki.git --- diff --git a/doc/bugs/recentchanges_feed_links.mdwn b/doc/bugs/recentchanges_feed_links.mdwn index eb543587c..41d7719ea 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/recentchanges_feed_links.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/recentchanges_feed_links.mdwn @@ -27,8 +27,15 @@ to turn on? --Chapman Flack >>> todo about [[todo/ability_to_force_particular_UUIDs_on_blog_posts]], >>> and then by just using that new ability in the page. --[[Joey]] ->>>> Ah. The prerequisite todo looks like more than I'd like to take on. +>>>> Ah. The prerequisite todo looks like more than I'd like to take on. >>>> In the meantime, would it be very involved to change whatever bug now >>>> optimizes away the change pages, or to simply have all the links in the >>>> feed point to the recentchanges page itself, with no fragment id? ->>>> Either would be a bit nicer than having broken links in the feed. --Chap +>>>> Either would be a bit nicer than having broken links in the feed. --Chap + +>>>> Does the completion of that todo mean it would be straightforward to get +>>>> recentchanges working now? Is it just that the recentchanges plugin +>>>> needs to generate `\[[!meta guid=something]]` into the internal files, +>>>> and the inline plugin would then generate working links in feeds? How should +>>>> the guid be constructed? Something based on the rcs revision number? I guess +>>>> I'm still not completely clear on your vision for how it ought to work. --Chap