From: David Bremner Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:14:24 +0000 (+2000) Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=10548921aa377fef13063a8aad364d5a2d6ed428;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To --- diff --git a/d4/041924a0fe842e65f5fa9b35a24bfdd5e62d25 b/d4/041924a0fe842e65f5fa9b35a24bfdd5e62d25 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c95ebab47 --- /dev/null +++ b/d4/041924a0fe842e65f5fa9b35a24bfdd5e62d25 @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2D66DE179E + for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 04:14:29 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.323 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.323 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.228, + RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled +Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id qlyUsvlK5ngO for ; + Fri, 4 Dec 2015 04:14:27 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) + by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C96F6DE1413 + for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 04:14:27 -0800 (PST) +Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) + (envelope-from ) + id 1a4pFn-0007EV-BS; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:14:23 -0500 +Received: (nullmailer pid 6204 invoked by uid 1000); + Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:14:24 -0000 +From: David Bremner +To: Damien Cassou , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To +In-Reply-To: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me> +References: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+7~g55fb7da (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:14:24 -0400 +Message-ID: <8737vi8l7j.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:14:30 -0000 + +Damien Cassou writes: + +> "To" : "rmod@inria.fr", +> "Reply-To" : "rmod@inria.fr", +> "From" : "seaside@rmod.inria.fr", +> "Subject" : "[rmod] [Mm10s] 2015-11-30", +> "Date" : "Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:00:01 +0100" + +A quick look at the code suggests this is falling victim to the +"reply-to munging" detection code, which considers a reply-to field +redudant if it duplicates one of the other fields. From the source + + /* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad + * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html + * + * The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a + * redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists + * in either To or Cc). So in this case, we ignore the Reply-To + * field and use the From header. This ensures the original sender + * will get the reply even if not subscribed to the list. Note + * that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in + * the reply. + */