From: Christian Couder Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:22:40 +0000 (+0200) Subject: documentation: user-manual: update "using-bisect" section X-Git-Tag: v1.6.0-rc2~46 X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0e25790f1d9cbbcac5dc6fbcea3096c3590f45d7;p=git.git documentation: user-manual: update "using-bisect" section Since version 1.5.6 "git bisect" doesn't use a "bisect" branch any more, but the user manual had not been updated to reflect this. So this patch does that and while at it also adds a few words about "git bisect skip" and points user to the "git bisect" man page for more information. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index 00256ca57..43f4e392f 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -479,10 +479,10 @@ Bisecting: 3537 revisions left to test after this ------------------------------------------------- If you run "git branch" at this point, you'll see that git has -temporarily moved you to a new branch named "bisect". This branch -points to a commit (with commit id 65934...) that is reachable from -"master" but not from v2.6.18. Compile and test it, and see whether -it crashes. Assume it does crash. Then: +temporarily moved you in "(no branch)". HEAD is now detached from any +branch and points directly to a commit (with commit id 65934...) that +is reachable from "master" but not from v2.6.18. Compile and test it, +and see whether it crashes. Assume it does crash. Then: ------------------------------------------------- $ git bisect bad @@ -504,8 +504,7 @@ report with the commit id. Finally, run $ git bisect reset ------------------------------------------------- -to return you to the branch you were on before and delete the -temporary "bisect" branch. +to return you to the branch you were on before. Note that the version which git-bisect checks out for you at each point is just a suggestion, and you're free to try a different @@ -528,6 +527,22 @@ $ git reset --hard fb47ddb2db... then test, run "bisect good" or "bisect bad" as appropriate, and continue. +Instead of "git bisect visualize" and then "git reset --hard +fb47ddb2db...", you might just want to tell git that you want to skip +the current commit: + +------------------------------------------------- +$ git bisect skip +------------------------------------------------- + +In this case, though, git may not eventually be able to tell the first +bad one between some first skipped commits and a latter bad commit. + +There are also ways to automate the bisecting process if you have a +test script that can tell a good from a bad commit. See +linkgit:git-bisect[1] for more information about this and other "git +bisect" features. + [[naming-commits]] Naming commits --------------